wip: on collaborative scheduling

This commit is contained in:
Jonathan Kelley committed 2021-08-09 02:37:11 -04:00
1 parent fac42339c2
commit 1a323835c8
5 files changed
+122 -155

No files matched your search

+24
View File
@@ -2,6 +2,30 @@
//! --------------
//! This crate implements a renderer of the Dioxus Virtual DOM for the web browser using Websys.
/*
From Google's guide on rAF and rIC:
--------
If the callback is fired at the end of the frame, it will be scheduled to go after the current frame has been committed,
which means that style changes will have been applied, and, importantly, layout calculated. If we make DOM changes inside
of the idle callback, those layout calculations will be invalidated. If there are any kind of layout reads in the next
frame, e.g. getBoundingClientRect, clientWidth, etc, the browser will have to perform a Forced Synchronous Layout,
which is a potential performance bottleneck.
Another reason not trigger DOM changes in the idle callback is that the time impact of changing the DOM is unpredictable,
and as such we could easily go past the deadline the browser provided.
The best practice is to only make DOM changes inside of a requestAnimationFrame callback, since it is scheduled by the
browser with that type of work in mind. That means that our code will need to use a document fragment, which can then
be appended in the next requestAnimationFrame callback. If you are using a VDOM library, you would use requestIdleCallback
to make changes, but you would apply the DOM patches in the next requestAnimationFrame callback, not the idle callback.
Essentially:
------------
- Do the VDOM work during the idlecallback
- Do DOM work in the next requestAnimationFrame callback
*/
use std::rc::Rc;
pub use crate::cfg::WebConfig;