Feat: massive changes to definition of components

This change switches back to the original `ctx<props>` syntax for
commponents. This lets lifetime elision to remove the need to match
exactly which lifetime (props or ctx) gets  carried to the output. As
such, `Props` is currently required to be static. It *is* possible to
loosen this restriction, and will be done in the future, though only
through adding metadata about the props through the Props derive
macro. Implementing the IS_STATIC trait is unsafe, so the derive macro
will do it through some heuristics.

For now, this unlocks sharing vnodes from parents to children, enabling
pass-thru components, fragments, portals, etc.
This commit is contained in:
Jonathan Kelley committed 2021-06-01 18:33:15 -04:00
1 parent c1fd848f89
commit 508c560320
82 files changed
+692 -558

No files matched your search

+11 -1
View File
@@ -40,6 +40,16 @@ pub fn rsx_template(s: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
}
}
/// The html! macro makes it easy for developers to write jsx-style markup in their components.
/// We aim to keep functional parity with html templates.
#[proc_macro]
pub fn html_template(s: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
match syn::parse::<rsxtemplate::RsxTemplate>(s) {
Err(e) => e.to_compile_error().into(),
Ok(s) => s.to_token_stream().into(),
}
}
// #[proc_macro_attribute]
// pub fn fc(attr: TokenStream, item: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
@@ -51,7 +61,7 @@ pub fn rsx_template(s: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
/// ```ignore
///
/// #[fc]
/// fn Example(ctx: Context, name: &str) -> DomTree {
/// fn Example(ctx: Context, name: &str) -> VNode {
/// ctx.render(rsx! { h1 {"hello {name}"} })
/// }
/// ```