Feat: massive changes to definition of components
This change switches back to the original `ctx<props>` syntax for commponents. This lets lifetime elision to remove the need to match exactly which lifetime (props or ctx) gets carried to the output. As such, `Props` is currently required to be static. It *is* possible to loosen this restriction, and will be done in the future, though only through adding metadata about the props through the Props derive macro. Implementing the IS_STATIC trait is unsafe, so the derive macro will do it through some heuristics. For now, this unlocks sharing vnodes from parents to children, enabling pass-thru components, fragments, portals, etc.
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
c1fd848f89
commit
508c560320
82 files changed
+692
-558
No files matched your search
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ struct ExampleProps {
|
||||
initial_name: String,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static Example: FC<ExampleProps> = |ctx, props| {
|
||||
let dispaly_name = use_state_new(&ctx, move || props.initial_name.clone());
|
||||
static Example: FC<ExampleProps> = |ctx| {
|
||||
let dispaly_name = use_state_new(&ctx, move || ctx.initial_name.clone());
|
||||
|
||||
let buttons = ["Jack", "Jill", "Bob"].iter().map(|name| {
|
||||
rsx!{
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user