style: rustfmt the Phase 1 test additions
The per-file Phase 1 test commits were written without running rustfmt as I went; this pass formats the new test code (long assert_eq! lines wrapped, etc.). Formatting-only — no behavioural change.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -599,7 +599,10 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
// direction and the loss tie-breaking.
|
||||
let translated = vec![vec![1.0, 0.0], vec![0.0, 1.0]];
|
||||
let p = estimate_p(&[0, 1], &translated, 2);
|
||||
assert!((p - 0.25).abs() < 1e-12, "expected smallest candidate, got {p}");
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
(p - 0.25).abs() < 1e-12,
|
||||
"expected smallest candidate, got {p}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
@@ -625,7 +628,11 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
mutation: PolynomialMutation::new(bounds, 20.0, 1.0),
|
||||
};
|
||||
let mut opt = AgeMoea::new(
|
||||
AgeMoeaConfig { population_size: 8, generations: 10, seed: 7 },
|
||||
AgeMoeaConfig {
|
||||
population_size: 8,
|
||||
generations: 10,
|
||||
seed: 7,
|
||||
},
|
||||
initializer,
|
||||
variation,
|
||||
);
|
||||
@@ -666,7 +673,11 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
};
|
||||
for pop in [4_usize, 12, 30] {
|
||||
let mut opt = AgeMoea::new(
|
||||
AgeMoeaConfig { population_size: pop, generations: 5, seed: 13 },
|
||||
AgeMoeaConfig {
|
||||
population_size: pop,
|
||||
generations: 5,
|
||||
seed: 13,
|
||||
},
|
||||
initializer.clone(),
|
||||
variation.clone(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
@@ -690,7 +701,11 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
let pop = 6_usize;
|
||||
let gens = 4_usize;
|
||||
let mut opt = AgeMoea::new(
|
||||
AgeMoeaConfig { population_size: pop, generations: gens, seed: 13 },
|
||||
AgeMoeaConfig {
|
||||
population_size: pop,
|
||||
generations: gens,
|
||||
seed: 13,
|
||||
},
|
||||
initializer,
|
||||
variation,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -644,7 +644,10 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
// k = exp(-0.5 * (1)^2) = exp(-0.5) ≈ 0.6065
|
||||
let got = rbf_kernel(&[0.0], &[1.0], &[1.0], 1.0);
|
||||
let expected = (-0.5_f64).exp();
|
||||
assert!((got - expected).abs() < 1e-12, "got {got}, expected {expected}");
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
(got - expected).abs() < 1e-12,
|
||||
"got {got}, expected {expected}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -766,19 +766,37 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
a.constraint_violation = 0.0;
|
||||
let mut b = Evaluation::new(vec![1.0]);
|
||||
b.constraint_violation = 1.0;
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare_so(&a, &b, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare_so(&b, &a, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Greater);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare_so(&a, &b, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare_so(&b, &a, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Greater
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn compare_so_two_feasible_under_min_and_max() {
|
||||
let a = Evaluation::new(vec![1.0]);
|
||||
let b = Evaluation::new(vec![2.0]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare_so(&a, &b, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare_so(&b, &a, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Greater);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare_so(&a, &b, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare_so(&b, &a, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Greater
|
||||
);
|
||||
// Maximize inverts.
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare_so(&a, &b, Direction::Maximize), std::cmp::Ordering::Greater);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare_so(&b, &a, Direction::Maximize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare_so(&a, &b, Direction::Maximize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Greater
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare_so(&b, &a, Direction::Maximize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
@@ -787,8 +805,14 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
a.constraint_violation = 0.5;
|
||||
let mut b = Evaluation::new(vec![0.0]);
|
||||
b.constraint_violation = 1.0;
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare_so(&a, &b, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare_so(&b, &a, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Greater);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare_so(&a, &b, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare_so(&b, &a, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Greater
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -446,15 +446,24 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
fn compare_for_fitness_two_feasible_min_and_max() {
|
||||
let lo = fc(1.0);
|
||||
let hi = fc(2.0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare_for_fitness(&lo, &hi, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare_for_fitness(&lo, &hi, Direction::Maximize), std::cmp::Ordering::Greater);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare_for_fitness(&lo, &hi, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare_for_fitness(&lo, &hi, Direction::Maximize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Greater
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn compare_for_fitness_two_infeasible_lower_violation_wins() {
|
||||
let low = fc_cv(0.0, 0.3);
|
||||
let high = fc_cv(0.0, 0.9);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare_for_fitness(&low, &high, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare_for_fitness(&low, &high, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// `survival_selection` carries `elitism` parents and `n - elitism`
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -415,7 +415,12 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
mutation: PolynomialMutation::new(bounds, 20.0, 1.0),
|
||||
};
|
||||
let mut opt = Grea::new(
|
||||
GreaConfig { population_size: pop, generations: 5, grid_divisions: 8, seed: 3 },
|
||||
GreaConfig {
|
||||
population_size: pop,
|
||||
generations: 5,
|
||||
grid_divisions: 8,
|
||||
seed: 3,
|
||||
},
|
||||
initializer,
|
||||
variation,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -290,7 +290,10 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn hill_climber_never_worsens_objective() {
|
||||
let mut opt = HillClimber::new(
|
||||
HillClimberConfig { iterations: 200, seed: 5 },
|
||||
HillClimberConfig {
|
||||
iterations: 200,
|
||||
seed: 5,
|
||||
},
|
||||
RealBounds::new(vec![(-3.0, 3.0); 2]),
|
||||
GaussianMutation { sigma: 0.3 },
|
||||
);
|
||||
@@ -306,7 +309,10 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn hill_climber_decreases_sphere() {
|
||||
let mut opt = HillClimber::new(
|
||||
HillClimberConfig { iterations: 500, seed: 11 },
|
||||
HillClimberConfig {
|
||||
iterations: 500,
|
||||
seed: 11,
|
||||
},
|
||||
RealBounds::new(vec![(-3.0, 3.0)]),
|
||||
GaussianMutation { sigma: 0.2 },
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -595,6 +595,9 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
wins0 += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert!(wins0 > 130, "index 0 won only {wins0}/200 — comparison likely flipped");
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
wins0 > 130,
|
||||
"index 0 won only {wins0}/200 — comparison likely flipped"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -451,16 +451,31 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
fn compare_feasibility_first_and_direction() {
|
||||
let feasible = Evaluation::new(vec![10.0]);
|
||||
let infeasible = Evaluation::constrained(vec![0.0], 1.0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare(&feasible, &infeasible, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare(&infeasible, &feasible, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Greater);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare(&feasible, &infeasible, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare(&infeasible, &feasible, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Greater
|
||||
);
|
||||
let lo = Evaluation::new(vec![1.0]);
|
||||
let hi = Evaluation::new(vec![2.0]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare(&lo, &hi, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare(&lo, &hi, Direction::Maximize), std::cmp::Ordering::Greater);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare(&lo, &hi, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare(&lo, &hi, Direction::Maximize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Greater
|
||||
);
|
||||
// two infeasible: smaller violation is "Less" (better).
|
||||
let v_lo = Evaluation::constrained(vec![0.0], 0.2);
|
||||
let v_hi = Evaluation::constrained(vec![0.0], 0.8);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare(&v_lo, &v_hi, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare(&v_lo, &v_hi, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -501,7 +501,10 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
let pool = vec![ibea_cand(vec![1.0, 1.0]), ibea_cand(vec![2.0, 2.0])];
|
||||
let fit = compute_fitness(&pool, &ibea_space(), 0.05);
|
||||
assert_eq!(fit.len(), 2);
|
||||
assert!(fit[0] > fit[1], "dominating point should score higher: {fit:?}");
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
fit[0] > fit[1],
|
||||
"dominating point should score higher: {fit:?}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
||||
+10
-2
@@ -408,8 +408,16 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
// Determinism cross-check.
|
||||
let mut opt2 = make_optimizer(7);
|
||||
let r2 = opt2.run(&SchafferN1);
|
||||
let f1: Vec<Vec<f64>> = r.pareto_front.iter().map(|c| c.evaluation.objectives.clone()).collect();
|
||||
let f2: Vec<Vec<f64>> = r2.pareto_front.iter().map(|c| c.evaluation.objectives.clone()).collect();
|
||||
let f1: Vec<Vec<f64>> = r
|
||||
.pareto_front
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|c| c.evaluation.objectives.clone())
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
let f2: Vec<Vec<f64>> = r2
|
||||
.pareto_front
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|c| c.evaluation.objectives.clone())
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
assert_eq!(f1, f2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -560,14 +560,26 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
fn compare_feasibility_first_and_direction() {
|
||||
let feasible = Evaluation::new(vec![10.0]);
|
||||
let infeasible = Evaluation::constrained(vec![0.0], 1.0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare(&feasible, &infeasible, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare(&feasible, &infeasible, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
let lo = Evaluation::new(vec![1.0]);
|
||||
let hi = Evaluation::new(vec![2.0]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare(&lo, &hi, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare(&lo, &hi, Direction::Maximize), std::cmp::Ordering::Greater);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare(&lo, &hi, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare(&lo, &hi, Direction::Maximize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Greater
|
||||
);
|
||||
let v_lo = Evaluation::constrained(vec![0.0], 0.2);
|
||||
let v_hi = Evaluation::constrained(vec![0.0], 0.8);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare(&v_lo, &v_hi, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare(&v_lo, &v_hi, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
||||
+15
-3
@@ -313,7 +313,11 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
fn produces_deterministic_nonempty_front() {
|
||||
let make = || {
|
||||
Paes::new(
|
||||
PaesConfig { iterations: 40, archive_size: 10, seed: 5 },
|
||||
PaesConfig {
|
||||
iterations: 40,
|
||||
archive_size: 10,
|
||||
seed: 5,
|
||||
},
|
||||
RealBounds::new(vec![(-5.0, 5.0)]),
|
||||
GaussianMutation { sigma: 0.3 },
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -321,8 +325,16 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
let r1 = make().run(&SchafferN1);
|
||||
let r2 = make().run(&SchafferN1);
|
||||
assert!(!r1.pareto_front.is_empty());
|
||||
let f1: Vec<Vec<f64>> = r1.pareto_front.iter().map(|c| c.evaluation.objectives.clone()).collect();
|
||||
let f2: Vec<Vec<f64>> = r2.pareto_front.iter().map(|c| c.evaluation.objectives.clone()).collect();
|
||||
let f1: Vec<Vec<f64>> = r1
|
||||
.pareto_front
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|c| c.evaluation.objectives.clone())
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
let f2: Vec<Vec<f64>> = r2
|
||||
.pareto_front
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|c| c.evaluation.objectives.clone())
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
assert_eq!(f1, f2);
|
||||
// Archive never exceeds its configured cap.
|
||||
assert!(r1.pareto_front.len() <= 10);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -560,6 +560,9 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Index 2 wins whenever it's drawn against 0 or 1, plus half its
|
||||
// self-draws — clear majority.
|
||||
assert!(picked_uncrowded > 150, "uncrowded picked {picked_uncrowded}/300");
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
picked_uncrowded > 150,
|
||||
"uncrowded picked {picked_uncrowded}/300"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -224,7 +224,11 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn best_is_no_worse_than_any_sample() {
|
||||
let mut opt = RandomSearch::new(
|
||||
RandomSearchConfig { iterations: 50, batch_size: 2, seed: 9 },
|
||||
RandomSearchConfig {
|
||||
iterations: 50,
|
||||
batch_size: 2,
|
||||
seed: 9,
|
||||
},
|
||||
RealBounds::new(vec![(-3.0, 3.0)]),
|
||||
);
|
||||
let r = opt.run(&Sphere1D);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -591,6 +591,9 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
fn smallest_neighbor_angle_of_orthogonal_refs_is_pi_over_2() {
|
||||
let refs = vec![vec![1.0, 0.0], vec![0.0, 1.0]];
|
||||
let a = smallest_neighbor_angle(&refs);
|
||||
assert!((a - std::f64::consts::FRAC_PI_2).abs() < 1e-9, "angle = {a}");
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
(a - std::f64::consts::FRAC_PI_2).abs() < 1e-9,
|
||||
"angle = {a}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+12
-3
@@ -483,11 +483,20 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
fn compare_feasibility_first_and_direction() {
|
||||
let feasible = Evaluation::new(vec![100.0]);
|
||||
let infeasible = Evaluation::constrained(vec![0.0], 1.0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare(&feasible, &infeasible, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare(&feasible, &infeasible, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
let lo = Evaluation::new(vec![1.0]);
|
||||
let hi = Evaluation::new(vec![2.0]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare(&lo, &hi, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare(&lo, &hi, Direction::Maximize), std::cmp::Ordering::Greater);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare(&lo, &hi, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare(&lo, &hi, Direction::Maximize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Greater
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
||||
+16
-4
@@ -456,14 +456,26 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
fn compare_so_feasibility_first_and_direction() {
|
||||
let feasible = Evaluation::new(vec![100.0]);
|
||||
let infeasible = Evaluation::constrained(vec![0.0], 1.0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare_so(&feasible, &infeasible, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare_so(&feasible, &infeasible, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
let lo = Evaluation::new(vec![1.0]);
|
||||
let hi = Evaluation::new(vec![2.0]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare_so(&lo, &hi, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare_so(&lo, &hi, Direction::Maximize), std::cmp::Ordering::Greater);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare_so(&lo, &hi, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare_so(&lo, &hi, Direction::Maximize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Greater
|
||||
);
|
||||
let v_lo = Evaluation::constrained(vec![0.0], 0.2);
|
||||
let v_hi = Evaluation::constrained(vec![0.0], 0.8);
|
||||
assert_eq!(compare_so(&v_lo, &v_hi, Direction::Minimize), std::cmp::Ordering::Less);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
compare_so(&v_lo, &v_hi, Direction::Minimize),
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Less
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
||||
+33
-22
@@ -598,9 +598,18 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
let v: Vec<i64> = vec![-3, 0, 7];
|
||||
let got = v.to_decision_values();
|
||||
assert_eq!(got.len(), 3);
|
||||
assert_eq!(got[0], serde_json::Value::Number(serde_json::Number::from(-3i64)));
|
||||
assert_eq!(got[1], serde_json::Value::Number(serde_json::Number::from(0i64)));
|
||||
assert_eq!(got[2], serde_json::Value::Number(serde_json::Number::from(7i64)));
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
got[0],
|
||||
serde_json::Value::Number(serde_json::Number::from(-3i64))
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
got[1],
|
||||
serde_json::Value::Number(serde_json::Number::from(0i64))
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
got[2],
|
||||
serde_json::Value::Number(serde_json::Number::from(7i64))
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Pins the *exact* booleans, not just the count.
|
||||
@@ -642,8 +651,7 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
fn from_result_propagates_evaluation_and_generation_counts() {
|
||||
let problem = SingleObjMin;
|
||||
let cands = vec![Candidate::new(vec![1.0], Evaluation::new(vec![1.0]))];
|
||||
let result =
|
||||
OptimizationResult::new(Population::new(cands.clone()), cands, None, 137, 9);
|
||||
let result = OptimizationResult::new(Population::new(cands.clone()), cands, None, 137, 9);
|
||||
let export = ExplorerExport::from_result(&problem, &result);
|
||||
assert_eq!(export.run.evaluations, 137);
|
||||
assert_eq!(export.run.generations, 9);
|
||||
@@ -654,8 +662,8 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
fn with_problem_name_sets_field_and_preserves_other_state() {
|
||||
let problem = SingleObjMin;
|
||||
let result = make_result(vec![vec![1.0]], |d| vec![d[0]]);
|
||||
let export = ExplorerExport::from_result(&problem, &result)
|
||||
.with_problem_name("Toy Problem");
|
||||
let export =
|
||||
ExplorerExport::from_result(&problem, &result).with_problem_name("Toy Problem");
|
||||
assert_eq!(export.run.problem_name.as_deref(), Some("Toy Problem"));
|
||||
// The candidates and objectives should still be intact, proving the
|
||||
// chained builder isn't replacing the whole struct.
|
||||
@@ -678,9 +686,12 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
fn with_timestamp_sets_field_and_preserves_other_state() {
|
||||
let problem = SingleObjMin;
|
||||
let result = make_result(vec![vec![1.0]], |d| vec![d[0]]);
|
||||
let export = ExplorerExport::from_result(&problem, &result)
|
||||
.with_timestamp("2025-01-01T00:00:00Z");
|
||||
assert_eq!(export.run.timestamp.as_deref(), Some("2025-01-01T00:00:00Z"));
|
||||
let export =
|
||||
ExplorerExport::from_result(&problem, &result).with_timestamp("2025-01-01T00:00:00Z");
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
export.run.timestamp.as_deref(),
|
||||
Some("2025-01-01T00:00:00Z")
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(export.candidates.len(), 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -708,8 +719,7 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
fn to_writer_emits_full_export() {
|
||||
let problem = SingleObjMin;
|
||||
let result = make_result(vec![vec![1.0]], |d| vec![d[0]]);
|
||||
let export = ExplorerExport::from_result(&problem, &result)
|
||||
.with_problem_name("MyProblem");
|
||||
let export = ExplorerExport::from_result(&problem, &result).with_problem_name("MyProblem");
|
||||
let mut buf: Vec<u8> = Vec::new();
|
||||
export.to_writer(&mut buf).unwrap();
|
||||
assert!(!buf.is_empty());
|
||||
@@ -725,16 +735,15 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
use std::io::Read;
|
||||
let problem = SingleObjMin;
|
||||
let result = make_result(vec![vec![1.0]], |d| vec![d[0]]);
|
||||
let export = ExplorerExport::from_result(&problem, &result)
|
||||
.with_problem_name("OnDisk");
|
||||
let export = ExplorerExport::from_result(&problem, &result).with_problem_name("OnDisk");
|
||||
let dir = std::env::temp_dir();
|
||||
let path = dir.join(format!(
|
||||
"heuropt-explorer-test-{}.json",
|
||||
std::process::id()
|
||||
));
|
||||
let path = dir.join(format!("heuropt-explorer-test-{}.json", std::process::id()));
|
||||
export.to_file(&path).unwrap();
|
||||
let mut s = String::new();
|
||||
std::fs::File::open(&path).unwrap().read_to_string(&mut s).unwrap();
|
||||
std::fs::File::open(&path)
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.read_to_string(&mut s)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let _ = std::fs::remove_file(&path);
|
||||
let back: ExplorerExport = serde_json::from_str(&s).unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(back.run.problem_name.as_deref(), Some("OnDisk"));
|
||||
@@ -777,7 +786,10 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
));
|
||||
super::to_file(&path, &problem, &DummyAlgo, &result).unwrap();
|
||||
let mut s = String::new();
|
||||
std::fs::File::open(&path).unwrap().read_to_string(&mut s).unwrap();
|
||||
std::fs::File::open(&path)
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.read_to_string(&mut s)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let _ = std::fs::remove_file(&path);
|
||||
let back: ExplorerExport = serde_json::from_str(&s).unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(back.run.algorithm.as_deref(), Some("DummyAlgo"));
|
||||
@@ -877,8 +889,7 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
/// the pad (too few objectives) and truncate (too many) cases.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn candidate_to_export_pads_short_objectives_with_nan() {
|
||||
let c: Candidate<Vec<f64>> =
|
||||
Candidate::new(vec![1.0], Evaluation::new(vec![1.0]));
|
||||
let c: Candidate<Vec<f64>> = Candidate::new(vec![1.0], Evaluation::new(vec![1.0]));
|
||||
let exported = candidate_to_export(&c, 0, 3);
|
||||
assert_eq!(exported.objectives.len(), 3);
|
||||
assert_eq!(exported.objectives[0], 1.0);
|
||||
|
||||
+10
-10
@@ -560,12 +560,12 @@ mod nd_tests {
|
||||
/// positive value for a dominating point.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn hypervolume_nd_from_evaluations_empty_and_nonempty() {
|
||||
let s = ObjectiveSpace::new(vec![
|
||||
Objective::minimize("f1"),
|
||||
Objective::minimize("f2"),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
let s = ObjectiveSpace::new(vec![Objective::minimize("f1"), Objective::minimize("f2")]);
|
||||
let empty: Vec<&Evaluation> = Vec::new();
|
||||
assert_eq!(hypervolume_nd_from_evaluations(&empty, &s, &[2.0, 2.0]), 0.0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
hypervolume_nd_from_evaluations(&empty, &s, &[2.0, 2.0]),
|
||||
0.0
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let e = Evaluation::new(vec![1.0, 1.0]);
|
||||
let evals = vec![&e];
|
||||
@@ -577,13 +577,13 @@ mod nd_tests {
|
||||
/// A point that does not strictly dominate the reference contributes 0.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn hypervolume_nd_from_evaluations_skips_non_dominating() {
|
||||
let s = ObjectiveSpace::new(vec![
|
||||
Objective::minimize("f1"),
|
||||
Objective::minimize("f2"),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
let s = ObjectiveSpace::new(vec![Objective::minimize("f1"), Objective::minimize("f2")]);
|
||||
// (2, 1): axis 0 equals the reference → not strictly dominating.
|
||||
let e = Evaluation::new(vec![2.0, 1.0]);
|
||||
let evals = vec![&e];
|
||||
assert_eq!(hypervolume_nd_from_evaluations(&evals, &s, &[2.0, 2.0]), 0.0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
hypervolume_nd_from_evaluations(&evals, &s, &[2.0, 2.0]),
|
||||
0.0
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -135,7 +135,10 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
];
|
||||
let got = spacing(&front, &s);
|
||||
let expected = (1536.0_f64 / 27.0).sqrt();
|
||||
assert!((got - expected).abs() < 1e-9, "got {got}, expected {expected}");
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
(got - expected).abs() < 1e-9,
|
||||
"got {got}, expected {expected}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A perfectly even front has zero spacing — the variance term is 0.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -994,7 +994,10 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
let c = m.vary(std::slice::from_ref(&parent), &mut rng);
|
||||
c[0] != parent
|
||||
});
|
||||
assert!(any_changed, "InversionMutation never modified an 8-element parent across 30 seeds");
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
any_changed,
|
||||
"InversionMutation never modified an 8-element parent across 30 seeds"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// `InsertionMutation` shifts an element across many seeds; at least one
|
||||
@@ -1195,6 +1198,9 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
let kids = erx.vary(&[p1.clone(), p2.clone()], &mut rng);
|
||||
kids[0] != kids[1]
|
||||
});
|
||||
assert!(any_distinct, "ERX never produced distinct children across 30 seeds");
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
any_distinct,
|
||||
"ERX never produced distinct children across 30 seeds"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+15
-7
@@ -733,7 +733,11 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
// snapshot, by design.
|
||||
|
||||
fn assert_close_slice(got: &[f64], want: &[f64], tol: f64) {
|
||||
assert_eq!(got.len(), want.len(), "length mismatch: got {got:?} want {want:?}");
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
got.len(),
|
||||
want.len(),
|
||||
"length mismatch: got {got:?} want {want:?}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
for (g, w) in got.iter().zip(want.iter()) {
|
||||
assert!((g - w).abs() < tol, "got {g}, want {w}; full got = {got:?}");
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -747,7 +751,11 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
let children = m.vary(std::slice::from_ref(&parent), &mut rng);
|
||||
assert_close_slice(
|
||||
&children[0],
|
||||
&[1.034_713_959_180_981_7, 2.066_469_060_997_062_6, 3.131_288_178_686_977],
|
||||
&[
|
||||
1.034_713_959_180_981_7,
|
||||
2.066_469_060_997_062_6,
|
||||
3.131_288_178_686_977,
|
||||
],
|
||||
1e-12,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -854,7 +862,10 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
// Same seed → same δ; the only difference is the (hi-lo) factor.
|
||||
// Ratio must be ≈ 10.
|
||||
let ratio = wide / narrow;
|
||||
assert!((ratio - 10.0).abs() < 1e-12, "ratio = {ratio}, narrow={narrow}, wide={wide}");
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
(ratio - 10.0).abs() < 1e-12,
|
||||
"ratio = {ratio}, narrow={narrow}, wide={wide}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
@@ -890,10 +901,7 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
fn mantegna_sigma_u_alpha_1_0_pinned() {
|
||||
// alpha = 1.0: sin(π/2) = 1, gamma(2) = 1, gamma(1) = 1 → σᵤ ≈ 1.
|
||||
let got = mantegna_sigma_u(1.0);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
(got - 1.0).abs() < 1e-12,
|
||||
"mantegna_sigma_u(1.0) = {got}",
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!((got - 1.0).abs() < 1e-12, "mantegna_sigma_u(1.0) = {got}",);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -317,9 +317,15 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn infeasible_candidate_with_smaller_violation_evicts_larger() {
|
||||
let mut a = ParetoArchive::<u32>::new(space_min2());
|
||||
a.insert(Candidate::new(1u32, Evaluation::constrained(vec![0.0, 0.0], 1.0)));
|
||||
a.insert(Candidate::new(
|
||||
1u32,
|
||||
Evaluation::constrained(vec![0.0, 0.0], 1.0),
|
||||
));
|
||||
// Smaller violation → dominates the existing infeasible member.
|
||||
a.insert(Candidate::new(2u32, Evaluation::constrained(vec![9.0, 9.0], 0.5)));
|
||||
a.insert(Candidate::new(
|
||||
2u32,
|
||||
Evaluation::constrained(vec![9.0, 9.0], 0.5),
|
||||
));
|
||||
assert_eq!(a.members().len(), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(a.members()[0].decision, 2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+10
-2
@@ -169,7 +169,11 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
fn interior_point_distance_is_pinned() {
|
||||
let s = space_min2();
|
||||
// Front along the line f1 + f2 = 4: (0,4), (2,2), (4,0).
|
||||
let pop = [cand(vec![0.0, 4.0]), cand(vec![2.0, 2.0]), cand(vec![4.0, 0.0])];
|
||||
let pop = [
|
||||
cand(vec![0.0, 4.0]),
|
||||
cand(vec![2.0, 2.0]),
|
||||
cand(vec![4.0, 0.0]),
|
||||
];
|
||||
let d = crowding_distance(&pop, &[0, 1, 2], &s);
|
||||
// Boundary points are infinite; the middle point gets
|
||||
// (4-0)/4 + (4-0)/4 = 2.0 (objective 0 span 4, objective 1 span 4).
|
||||
@@ -184,7 +188,11 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
fn asymmetric_interior_distance_is_pinned() {
|
||||
let s = space_min2();
|
||||
// (0,10), (1,2), (10,0): objective-0 span = 10, objective-1 span = 10.
|
||||
let pop = [cand(vec![0.0, 10.0]), cand(vec![1.0, 2.0]), cand(vec![10.0, 0.0])];
|
||||
let pop = [
|
||||
cand(vec![0.0, 10.0]),
|
||||
cand(vec![1.0, 2.0]),
|
||||
cand(vec![10.0, 0.0]),
|
||||
];
|
||||
let d = crowding_distance(&pop, &[0, 1, 2], &s);
|
||||
// middle point: obj0 (10-0)/10 = 1.0; obj1 (10-0)/10 = 1.0 → 2.0.
|
||||
assert!((d[1] - 2.0).abs() < 1e-12, "got {}", d[1]);
|
||||
|
||||
+42
-10
@@ -282,15 +282,27 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
let feasible = cand_min(1, 100.0);
|
||||
let infeasible = constrained(2, 0.0, 1.0);
|
||||
assert!(challenger_wins(&feasible, &infeasible, Direction::Minimize));
|
||||
assert!(!challenger_wins(&infeasible, &feasible, Direction::Minimize));
|
||||
assert!(!challenger_wins(
|
||||
&infeasible,
|
||||
&feasible,
|
||||
Direction::Minimize
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn challenger_wins_two_infeasible_compares_violation() {
|
||||
let less_violating = constrained(1, 0.0, 0.5);
|
||||
let more_violating = constrained(2, 0.0, 1.0);
|
||||
assert!(challenger_wins(&less_violating, &more_violating, Direction::Minimize));
|
||||
assert!(!challenger_wins(&more_violating, &less_violating, Direction::Minimize));
|
||||
assert!(challenger_wins(
|
||||
&less_violating,
|
||||
&more_violating,
|
||||
Direction::Minimize
|
||||
));
|
||||
assert!(!challenger_wins(
|
||||
&more_violating,
|
||||
&less_violating,
|
||||
Direction::Minimize
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
@@ -330,17 +342,37 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
let feasible_a = Evaluation::new(vec![10.0]);
|
||||
let infeasible_b = Evaluation::constrained(vec![0.0], 1.0);
|
||||
// feasible vs infeasible
|
||||
assert!(better_by_feasibility(&feasible_a, &infeasible_b, Direction::Minimize));
|
||||
assert!(!better_by_feasibility(&infeasible_b, &feasible_a, Direction::Minimize));
|
||||
assert!(better_by_feasibility(
|
||||
&feasible_a,
|
||||
&infeasible_b,
|
||||
Direction::Minimize
|
||||
));
|
||||
assert!(!better_by_feasibility(
|
||||
&infeasible_b,
|
||||
&feasible_a,
|
||||
Direction::Minimize
|
||||
));
|
||||
// two infeasible: smaller violation wins
|
||||
let low_cv = Evaluation::constrained(vec![0.0], 0.3);
|
||||
let high_cv = Evaluation::constrained(vec![0.0], 0.9);
|
||||
assert!(better_by_feasibility(&low_cv, &high_cv, Direction::Minimize));
|
||||
assert!(!better_by_feasibility(&high_cv, &low_cv, Direction::Minimize));
|
||||
assert!(better_by_feasibility(
|
||||
&low_cv,
|
||||
&high_cv,
|
||||
Direction::Minimize
|
||||
));
|
||||
assert!(!better_by_feasibility(
|
||||
&high_cv,
|
||||
&low_cv,
|
||||
Direction::Minimize
|
||||
));
|
||||
// two feasible: delegates to better_by_objective
|
||||
let feasible_lower = Evaluation::new(vec![1.0]);
|
||||
let feasible_higher = Evaluation::new(vec![2.0]);
|
||||
assert!(better_by_feasibility(&feasible_lower, &feasible_higher, Direction::Minimize));
|
||||
assert!(better_by_feasibility(
|
||||
&feasible_lower,
|
||||
&feasible_higher,
|
||||
Direction::Minimize
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
@@ -349,8 +381,8 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
// must rank first regardless of objective value.
|
||||
let s = ObjectiveSpace::new(vec![Objective::minimize("f")]);
|
||||
let pop = [
|
||||
constrained(1, 0.0, 2.0), // infeasible, great objective
|
||||
cand_min(2, 100.0), // feasible, terrible objective
|
||||
constrained(1, 0.0, 2.0), // infeasible, great objective
|
||||
cand_min(2, 100.0), // feasible, terrible objective
|
||||
];
|
||||
let mut rng = rng_from_seed(7);
|
||||
let picks = stochastic_ranking_select(&pop, &s, 0.0, 1, &mut rng);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user