The terminal output was misaligned: headers and data were right-aligned
with hardcoded column widths and separator lengths, and the mean ± std
cells contained the non-ASCII `±` (plus `ε`, `↑`, `↓`) -- on any terminal
that renders those at a non-1 column width the columns drift, and the
hardcoded `-`.repeat(n) separators didn't match the real table width
anyway.
Changes:
- New `print_table` helper: column widths derived from the actual cell
contents (header + every row), separator length computed to match.
- All table cells are now ASCII: `+/-` instead of `±`, `eps-MOEA`
instead of `ε-MOEA`, arrows dropped from headers.
- Every table is sorted best-first by its primary quality metric.
- Added three combinatorial / sequencing problems with their own
(permutation- / bitstring-native) algorithm rosters: a convex-position
ring TSP (known optimum), FT06 job-shop makespan (known optimum 55),
and a bi-objective 0/1 knapsack scored by hypervolume.
- Expanded every problem's preamble: what it is, why it's hard, and the
best-known / optimal result.
- Regenerated examples/compare-results.md to match.
Continuous-problem quality metrics are unchanged (bit-identical to prior
snapshots); only ms columns and row order move.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
CHANGELOG entry consolidates the unreleased work since v0.3.0:
testing-infrastructure expansion (proptest suites, cargo-fuzz
harness, stability tests, gungraun benches, CI), two real bug
fixes the testing surfaced (NaN-cycle non_dominated_sort, simplex
projection magnitude precision), the README decision-tree update
against the v0.3.0 comparison data, and the v0.4.0 perf pass
(cumulative compare harness 18.6 s → 5.7 s, 3.27×).
`examples/compare-results.md` refreshed with the post-perf-pass
ms numbers; quality metrics are bit-identical to the v0.3.0
snapshot (the perf pass was strictly CPU time, never algorithmic).
Snapshot of `cargo run --release --example compare` after the v0.3.0
algorithm cohort. The harness runs 7 benchmark problems × ~20
algorithms × 10 seeds each (≈3 minutes wall-clock); this file is the
reference output so readers can scan results without running it
themselves.
Highlights worth reading even if you're skipping the file:
- ZDT1: MOPSO and MOEA/D dominate convergence; (1+1)-ES and DE tie
at f = 0 on Rastrigin
- IPOP-CMA-ES drops vanilla CMA-ES from f=2.35 to f=0.13 on
Rastrigin (the multimodal failure-mode it was added to fix)
- IBEA wins DTLZ2 (15× closer to true front than NSGA-III)
- GrEA wins DTLZ1 (linear simplex front matches grid-based niching)
- Nelder-Mead = 0 exactly on Rosenbrock; CMA-ES at machine epsilon
- Bayesian optimization at 60 evals is honestly bad on 5-D problems
with the default kernel — flagged so readers don't conclude BO is
weak in general; it just needs more evals or hyperparameter tuning
swaitsandClaude Opus 4.7