The `compare` harness contradicts two recommendations in the decision
trees:
- "Disconnected or non-convex front -> AGE-MOEA, KnEA, IBEA" had it
backwards. Added KnEA to the ZDT3 table (the disconnected-front
benchmark) so the claim is actually exercised: AGE-MOEA and KnEA
finish *last and second-last*; IBEA wins, MOEA/D and NSGA-II follow.
The trees now split "disconnected" from "non-convex contiguous",
lead disconnected with IBEA, and note the geometry-aware methods
trail when the front is in pieces.
- The book filed Simulated Annealing on permutations as a "one-decision
baseline" and led the JSS row with GA. On the harness SA *wins* the
FT06 job-shop table and ties for the TSP optimum; SA/Tabu edge out
the GA. Reframed SA/Tabu as strong sequencing methods.
Also regenerated examples/compare-results.md for the new ZDT3 row.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
swaitsandClaude Opus 4.7
a9d72b94f4