feat(rfc-vibe): 0.1.0
This commit is contained in:
8 files changed
No files matched your search
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
|
||||
// one function to set the display of an RFC word
|
||||
#let __rfc-keyword(body) = emph(upper(body))
|
||||
#let __rfc-keyword-quoted(body) = emph(upper(["#body"]))
|
||||
|
||||
// a function (macro-like) for each of the possible RFC words
|
||||
#let must = __rfc-keyword("must")
|
||||
#let must-quoted = __rfc-keyword-quoted("must")
|
||||
#let must-not = __rfc-keyword("must not")
|
||||
#let required = __rfc-keyword("required")
|
||||
#let shall = __rfc-keyword("shall")
|
||||
#let shall-not = __rfc-keyword("shall not")
|
||||
#let should = __rfc-keyword("should")
|
||||
#let should-not = __rfc-keyword("should not")
|
||||
#let recommended = __rfc-keyword("recommended")
|
||||
#let not-recommended = __rfc-keyword("not recommended")
|
||||
#let may = __rfc-keyword("may")
|
||||
#let optional = __rfc-keyword("optional")
|
||||
|
||||
// quoted versions, so quotation marks get included in the emph()
|
||||
#let must-quoted = __rfc-keyword-quoted("must")
|
||||
#let must-not-quoted = __rfc-keyword-quoted("must not")
|
||||
#let required-quoted = __rfc-keyword-quoted("required")
|
||||
#let shall-quoted = __rfc-keyword-quoted("shall")
|
||||
#let shall-not-quoted = __rfc-keyword-quoted("shall not")
|
||||
#let should-quoted = __rfc-keyword-quoted("should")
|
||||
#let should-not-quoted = __rfc-keyword-quoted("should not")
|
||||
#let recommended-quoted = __rfc-keyword-quoted("recommended")
|
||||
#let not-recommended-quoted = __rfc-keyword-quoted("not recommended")
|
||||
#let may-quoted = __rfc-keyword-quoted("may")
|
||||
#let optional-quoted = __rfc-keyword-quoted("optional")
|
||||
|
||||
// links to the relevant BCP and RFCs
|
||||
#let bcp14-name = "BCP 14"
|
||||
#let bcp14-url = "https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp14"
|
||||
#let bcp14 = link(bcp14-url, bcp14-name)
|
||||
|
||||
#let rfc2119-name = "RFC2119"
|
||||
#let rfc2119-url = "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119"
|
||||
#let rfc2119 = link(rfc2119-url, rfc2119-name)
|
||||
|
||||
#let rfc8174-name = "RFC8174"
|
||||
#let rfc8174-url = "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174"
|
||||
#let rfc8174 = link(rfc8174-url, rfc8174-name)
|
||||
|
||||
// the boilerplate you should include when using RFC words:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Authors who follow these guidelines should incorporate this phrase near
|
||||
// the beginning of their document:
|
||||
#let rfc-keyword-boilerplate = [
|
||||
The key words #must-quoted, #must-not-quoted, #required-quoted, #shall-quoted,
|
||||
#shall-not-quoted, #should-quoted, #should-not-quoted, #recommended-quoted,
|
||||
#not-recommended-quoted, #may-quoted, and #optional-quoted in this document
|
||||
are to be interpreted as described in #bcp14 [#rfc2119] [#rfc8174] when, and
|
||||
only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
// definitions for each of the words
|
||||
|
||||
#let rfc-keyword-must-definition = terms.item(
|
||||
must,
|
||||
[
|
||||
This word, or the terms #required-quoted or #shall-quoted, mean that the definition
|
||||
is an absolute requirement of the specification.
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
#let rfc-keyword-must-not-definition = terms.item(
|
||||
must-not,
|
||||
[
|
||||
This phrase, or the phrase #shall-not-quoted, mean that the definition is an
|
||||
absolute prohibition of the specification.
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
#let rfc-keyword-should-definition = terms.item(
|
||||
should,
|
||||
[
|
||||
This word, or the adjective #recommended-quoted, mean that there may exist valid
|
||||
reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular item, but the full
|
||||
implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing a
|
||||
different course.
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
#let rfc-keyword-should-not-definition = terms.item(
|
||||
should-not,
|
||||
[
|
||||
This phrase, or the phrase #not-recommended-quoted mean that there may exist
|
||||
valid reasons in particular circumstances when the particular behavior is
|
||||
acceptable or even useful, but the full implications should be understood and
|
||||
the case carefully weighed before implementing any behavior described with
|
||||
this label.
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
#let rfc-keyword-may-definition = terms.item(
|
||||
may,
|
||||
[
|
||||
This word, or the adjective "#optional", mean that an item is truly
|
||||
optional. One vendor may choose to include the item because a particular
|
||||
marketplace requires it or because the vendor feels that it enhances the
|
||||
product while another vendor may omit the same item. An implementation which
|
||||
does not include a particular option #must be prepared to interoperate with
|
||||
another implementation which does include the option, though perhaps with
|
||||
reduced functionality. In the same vein an implementation which does include a
|
||||
particular option #must be prepared to interoperate with another
|
||||
implementation which does not include the option (except, of course, for the
|
||||
feature the option provides.)
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// and all definitions in a single term list
|
||||
#let rfc-keyword-definitions = [
|
||||
#rfc-keyword-must-definition
|
||||
#rfc-keyword-must-not-definition
|
||||
#rfc-keyword-should-definition
|
||||
#rfc-keyword-should-not-definition
|
||||
#rfc-keyword-may-definition
|
||||
]
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user