P3: dated 1099 decisions, payment methods and the card exception (defects 23, 12, 18, D-40)
check / check (push) Canceled after 0s
check / check (push) Canceled after 0s
A vendor's 1099 decision is its own dated fact (files NEC or MISC, not reportable with its reason, or undetermined), applied by each payment's date. Payment methods are recorded; card and network payments are left out and listed; a member's check through financing counts; a bank payment with no method counts (D-40); $2,000 for payments after 2025. One worksheet for the tool, the viewer and the CPA package. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T3gXMVt7XJPi6ens1or9Dj
This commit is contained in:
77 files changed
+11455
-970
No files matched your search
@@ -5,15 +5,16 @@
|
||||
//! Each example is a setup, events and expected values worked by hand from
|
||||
//! its cited source (`bookspec/README.md` gives the shape). Every example
|
||||
//! must load, whatever it asks or whichever appendix it is in: its shape,
|
||||
//! its accounts, fixed assets, parties, members and payees, every event
|
||||
//! (an entry, a reversal, a close or a bill, posting entry #N as event N,
|
||||
//! with the parties and payee it is tagged with) and every change that
|
||||
//! its accounts, fixed assets, parties, members, payees, payees' dated
|
||||
//! 1099 decisions and payment methods, every event (an entry, a reversal,
|
||||
//! a close or a bill, posting entry #N as event N, with the parties,
|
||||
//! payee and payment method it is tagged with) and every change that
|
||||
//! posts no entry (a rename, a policy). The queries the core answers
|
||||
//! (`cash_flow`, `trial_balance`, `profit_and_loss`, `vendor_1099_paid`,
|
||||
//! `entry`, `balances`, `members_equity`, `k1`, `party_part`,
|
||||
//! `party_totals`, `party_tin_last4`, `period`, `day`, `calendar_year`,
|
||||
//! `account_names`, `uncategorized_accounts`) are then checked value by
|
||||
//! value, and the commands it tries
|
||||
//! `vendor_1099`, `entry`, `balances`, `members_equity`, `k1`,
|
||||
//! `party_part`, `party_totals`, `party_tin_last4`, `period`, `day`,
|
||||
//! `calendar_year`, `account_names`, `uncategorized_accounts`) are then
|
||||
//! checked value by value, and the commands it tries
|
||||
//! (`rename_account`, `add_account`, `set_tax_category`) accepted or
|
||||
//! refused on a copy of the books, each after the event it names (`after`)
|
||||
//! or the last; the formats appendix's (`iif_lines`, `iif_changes`) are
|
||||
@@ -27,13 +28,14 @@ use std::path::{Path, PathBuf};
|
||||
use chrono::NaiveDate;
|
||||
use ledger_core::calendar::{PeriodDefaults, period_defaults};
|
||||
use ledger_core::parties::{Basis, MoneyAccounts};
|
||||
use ledger_core::settings::Company;
|
||||
use ledger_core::settings::{Company, Source};
|
||||
use ledger_core::{
|
||||
AccountType, CashFlowParams, CashFlowSection, CashFlowStatement, CloseTo, Currency,
|
||||
DocumentLine, EntryId, Form1099, Ledger, LedgerError, MemberCapital, MemberClose, Money,
|
||||
NewAsset, PartyId, PartyMember, PartyShare, PaymentAccounts, ReconcilingKind, Role, Share,
|
||||
Side, TinFacts, TinType, VendorId, W9Facts, cash_flow, members_equity,
|
||||
profit_and_loss_for_period, trial_balance_as_of, vendor_1099_report_with_members,
|
||||
AccountType, CashFlowParams, CashFlowSection, CashFlowStatement, CloseTo, Currency, Dated1099,
|
||||
Decision1099, DocumentLine, EntryId, ExemptReason, Form1099, InstrumentId, InstrumentKind,
|
||||
Ledger, LedgerError, MemberCapital, MemberClose, Money, NewAsset, PartyId, PartyMember,
|
||||
PartyShare, PaymentAccounts, ReconcilingKind, Role, Share, Side, TinFacts, TinType, VendorId,
|
||||
W9Facts, cash_flow, members_equity, profit_and_loss_for_period, trial_balance_as_of,
|
||||
vendor_1099_report,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use rust_decimal::Decimal;
|
||||
use serde::Deserialize;
|
||||
@@ -83,6 +85,12 @@ struct Setup {
|
||||
members: Vec<MemberSpec>,
|
||||
#[serde(default)]
|
||||
payees: Vec<PayeeSpec>,
|
||||
/// A payee's 1099 decision from a date on (rules.md B-19, D-40).
|
||||
#[serde(default)]
|
||||
status_changes: Vec<StatusChangeSpec>,
|
||||
/// The ways the company (or a member, for it) pays (rules.md B-19).
|
||||
#[serde(default)]
|
||||
instruments: Vec<InstrumentSpec>,
|
||||
/// The day the books are asked on, in the company's time zone: what
|
||||
/// an omitted date means (rules.md B-30). A query that omits a date
|
||||
/// needs it.
|
||||
@@ -181,6 +189,38 @@ struct PartySpec {
|
||||
tin_purged: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A payee's 1099 decision from `effective` on (rules.md B-19, D-40).
|
||||
#[derive(Deserialize)]
|
||||
#[serde(deny_unknown_fields)]
|
||||
struct StatusChangeSpec {
|
||||
payee: String,
|
||||
effective: String,
|
||||
/// `"1099-NEC"`, `"1099-MISC"`, `"not_reportable"` (with `reason_kind`
|
||||
/// and `reason`) or `"undetermined"`.
|
||||
decision: String,
|
||||
#[serde(default)]
|
||||
reason_kind: Option<String>,
|
||||
#[serde(default)]
|
||||
reason: Option<String>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A payment method (rules.md B-19).
|
||||
#[derive(Deserialize)]
|
||||
#[serde(deny_unknown_fields)]
|
||||
struct InstrumentSpec {
|
||||
label: String,
|
||||
/// `bank`, `business_card`, `member_card`, `member_cash_or_check` or
|
||||
/// `platform`.
|
||||
kind: String,
|
||||
/// The account it pays through, by code.
|
||||
account: String,
|
||||
#[serde(default)]
|
||||
last4: Option<String>,
|
||||
/// The party it belongs to, by name (informational).
|
||||
#[serde(default)]
|
||||
owner: Option<String>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A party named on an entry, with its share: an `amount`, a `percent`,
|
||||
/// or neither (derived from the entry: rules.md B-35).
|
||||
#[derive(Deserialize)]
|
||||
@@ -214,6 +254,9 @@ struct Event {
|
||||
/// shares.
|
||||
#[serde(default)]
|
||||
parties: Vec<ShareSpec>,
|
||||
/// The payment method (an `setup.instruments` label) it was paid with.
|
||||
#[serde(default)]
|
||||
instrument: Option<String>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A bill from `vendor` for `amount`, dated and due on the event's date:
|
||||
@@ -287,6 +330,8 @@ struct Expect {
|
||||
party: Option<String>,
|
||||
/// `party_totals`' basis: `"cash"` or `"all"` (rules.md B-35 item 4).
|
||||
basis: Option<String>,
|
||||
/// The payee a `vendor_1099` query asks about (in `setup.payees`).
|
||||
payee: Option<String>,
|
||||
/// The books after event N, not after the last.
|
||||
after: Option<usize>,
|
||||
/// The account a `rename_account` or `set_tax_category` command
|
||||
@@ -482,6 +527,42 @@ struct Books<'a> {
|
||||
payees: BTreeMap<String, VendorId>,
|
||||
/// The vendors bills came from, by name (a payee's record if one).
|
||||
vendors: BTreeMap<String, VendorId>,
|
||||
/// The payment methods, by label.
|
||||
instruments: BTreeMap<String, InstrumentId>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Who an example's decisions and records are made by.
|
||||
fn bookspec_source(id: &str) -> Source {
|
||||
Source {
|
||||
decided_by: "bookspec".into(),
|
||||
decided_on: date("2026-01-01", id),
|
||||
citation: None,
|
||||
note: None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A payee's 1099 decision in an example's words (bookspec/README.md).
|
||||
fn decision(ex: &str, what: &str, kind: Option<&str>, reason: Option<&str>) -> Decision1099 {
|
||||
match what {
|
||||
"not_reportable" => {
|
||||
let kind = kind.and_then(ExemptReason::parse).unwrap_or_else(|| {
|
||||
panic!("{ex}: not_reportable needs a reason_kind, got {kind:?}")
|
||||
});
|
||||
let reason = reason.unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("{ex}: not_reportable needs a reason"));
|
||||
Decision1099::not_reportable(kind, reason).unwrap_or_else(|e| panic!("{ex}: {e}"))
|
||||
}
|
||||
"undetermined" | "1099-NEC" | "1099-MISC" => {
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
kind.is_none() && reason.is_none(),
|
||||
"{ex}: only not_reportable takes reason_kind and reason"
|
||||
);
|
||||
match Form1099::parse(what) {
|
||||
Some(f) if what.starts_with("1099-") => Decision1099::Files(f),
|
||||
_ => Decision1099::Undetermined,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
other => panic!("{ex}: decision {other:?}"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The example's directory (`setup.parties`), by name: each party with
|
||||
@@ -569,7 +650,8 @@ fn add_parties(ex: &Example, l: &mut Ledger) -> BTreeMap<String, PartyId> {
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'a> Books<'a> {
|
||||
/// The books an example sets up, before any event: its shape checked,
|
||||
/// its accounts, fixed assets, parties, members and payees.
|
||||
/// its accounts, fixed assets, parties, members, payees, their dated
|
||||
/// decisions, and payment methods.
|
||||
fn new(ex: &'a Example) -> Self {
|
||||
let s = &ex.setup;
|
||||
let currency = Currency::new(&s.currency).unwrap();
|
||||
@@ -684,6 +766,7 @@ impl<'a> Books<'a> {
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
let source = bookspec_source(&ex.id);
|
||||
let mut payees = BTreeMap::new();
|
||||
for p in &s.payees {
|
||||
let form = Form1099::parse(&p.form)
|
||||
@@ -697,7 +780,8 @@ impl<'a> Books<'a> {
|
||||
.add_vendor(&p.name)
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|e| panic!("{}: payee {}: {e}", ex.id, p.name)),
|
||||
};
|
||||
l.set_vendor_1099(v, Some(form), false)
|
||||
let dated = Dated1099::from_beginning(Decision1099::Files(form), Some(source.clone()));
|
||||
l.set_vendor_1099(v, dated, false)
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|e| panic!("{}: payee {}: {e}", ex.id, p.name));
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
payees.insert(p.name.clone(), v).is_none(),
|
||||
@@ -706,6 +790,47 @@ impl<'a> Books<'a> {
|
||||
p.name
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
for c in &s.status_changes {
|
||||
let what = format!("{} status change of {}", ex.id, c.payee);
|
||||
let &v = payees
|
||||
.get(&c.payee)
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("{what}: payee not in setup"));
|
||||
let dated = Dated1099 {
|
||||
effective: Some(date(&c.effective, &what)),
|
||||
decision: decision(
|
||||
&what,
|
||||
&c.decision,
|
||||
c.reason_kind.as_deref(),
|
||||
c.reason.as_deref(),
|
||||
),
|
||||
source: Some(source.clone()),
|
||||
};
|
||||
l.set_vendor_1099(v, dated, false)
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|e| panic!("{what}: {e}"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
let mut instruments = BTreeMap::new();
|
||||
for i in &s.instruments {
|
||||
let what = format!("{} instrument {}", ex.id, i.label);
|
||||
let kind = InstrumentKind::parse(&i.kind)
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("{what}: kind {:?}", i.kind));
|
||||
let account = l
|
||||
.chart()
|
||||
.find_by_code(&i.account)
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("{what}: no account {}", i.account))
|
||||
.id;
|
||||
let owner = i.owner.as_ref().map(|o| {
|
||||
*parties
|
||||
.get(o)
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("{what}: owner {o:?} not in setup.parties"))
|
||||
});
|
||||
let id = l
|
||||
.add_instrument(kind, &i.label, i.last4.as_deref(), owner, account)
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|e| panic!("{what}: {e}"));
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
instruments.insert(i.label.clone(), id).is_none(),
|
||||
"{what}: twice"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
Books {
|
||||
ex,
|
||||
l,
|
||||
@@ -715,6 +840,7 @@ impl<'a> Books<'a> {
|
||||
parties,
|
||||
vendors: payees.clone(),
|
||||
payees,
|
||||
instruments,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -735,8 +861,8 @@ impl<'a> Books<'a> {
|
||||
"{ex} event {n}: a reversal takes its original's payee, a bill names its vendor, and a close has none"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
e.parties.is_empty() || e.reverses.is_none(),
|
||||
"{ex} event {n}: a reversal takes its original's parties"
|
||||
(e.parties.is_empty() && e.instrument.is_none()) || e.reverses.is_none(),
|
||||
"{ex} event {n}: a reversal takes its original's parties and payment method"
|
||||
);
|
||||
let posted = match (&e.close, e.reverses, e.lines.is_empty()) {
|
||||
(None, None, true) if e.bill.is_some() => {
|
||||
@@ -883,6 +1009,15 @@ impl<'a> Books<'a> {
|
||||
.set_entry_vendor(n, Some(v))
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|err| panic!("{ex} event {n}: {err}"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if let Some(label) = &e.instrument {
|
||||
let i = *self
|
||||
.instruments
|
||||
.get(label)
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("{ex} event {n}: payment method {label:?} not in setup"));
|
||||
self.l
|
||||
.set_entry_instrument(n, Some(i))
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|err| panic!("{ex} event {n}: {err}"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1173,10 +1308,10 @@ fn check_profit_and_loss(ex: &Example, l: &Ledger, x: &Expect) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The 1099 report a `vendor_1099_paid` expectation asks for: the
|
||||
/// calendar year of `to`, from January 1 through `to`, out of the cash
|
||||
/// and financing accounts, an entry's shares resolved with the members
|
||||
/// who are parties (rules.md B-19, B-33).
|
||||
/// The 1099 report a `vendor_1099_paid` or `vendor_1099` expectation
|
||||
/// asks for: the calendar year of `to`, from January 1 through `to`, out
|
||||
/// of the cash and financing accounts, an entry's shares resolved with
|
||||
/// the members who are parties (rules.md B-19, B-33).
|
||||
fn report_1099(b: &Books<'_>, x: &Expect) -> (NaiveDate, NaiveDate, ledger_core::Vendor1099Report) {
|
||||
let (ex, l) = (b.ex, &b.l);
|
||||
// A calendar-year count, never the fiscal default (rules.md B-30):
|
||||
@@ -1205,7 +1340,7 @@ fn report_1099(b: &Books<'_>, x: &Expect) -> (NaiveDate, NaiveDate, ledger_core:
|
||||
cash: codes(l, &ex.setup.cash_accounts, &ex.id),
|
||||
financing: codes(l, &ex.setup.financing_accounts, &ex.id),
|
||||
};
|
||||
let r = vendor_1099_report_with_members(l, year, Some(to), None, &sources, &b.party_members)
|
||||
let r = vendor_1099_report(l, year, None, &sources, &b.party_members, Some(to))
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|e| panic!("{}: {e}", ex.id));
|
||||
(from, to, r)
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1229,6 +1364,55 @@ fn check_vendor_1099_paid(b: &Books<'_>, x: &Expect) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Check one `vendor_1099` expectation: one payee's line of the 1099
|
||||
/// worksheet ([`report_1099`]): `status` (`reportable`,
|
||||
/// `under_threshold`, `not_reportable`, `undetermined`), the `threshold`
|
||||
/// applied, and what was `paid` (counts toward its 1099),
|
||||
/// `excluded_card` (a card or payment network's, Form 1099-K),
|
||||
/// `undetermined` (its payment method not recorded) and `not_reportable`
|
||||
/// (paid while decided not reportable); every one given (rules.md B-19).
|
||||
fn check_vendor_1099(b: &Books<'_>, x: &Expect) {
|
||||
let ex = b.ex;
|
||||
let name = x
|
||||
.payee
|
||||
.as_deref()
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("{}: vendor_1099 names its payee", ex.id));
|
||||
let v = *b
|
||||
.payees
|
||||
.get(name)
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("{}: payee {name:?} not in setup", ex.id));
|
||||
let (from, to, r) = report_1099(b, x);
|
||||
let line = r
|
||||
.vendors
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.find(|l| l.vendor_id == v)
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("{}: the 1099 worksheet has no line for {name}", ex.id));
|
||||
let keys = [
|
||||
"status",
|
||||
"threshold",
|
||||
"paid",
|
||||
"excluded_card",
|
||||
"undetermined",
|
||||
"not_reportable",
|
||||
];
|
||||
exactly(ex, x, &keys.iter().map(|k| k.to_string()).collect());
|
||||
let what = |k: &str| format!("{} 1099 [{from} .. {to}] {name}: {k}", ex.id);
|
||||
for (key, want) in x.figures(&ex.id) {
|
||||
if key == "status" {
|
||||
assert_eq!(line.status.key(), want, "{}", what(key));
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
let got = match key.as_str() {
|
||||
"threshold" => r.threshold,
|
||||
"paid" => line.paid,
|
||||
"excluded_card" => line.excluded_card,
|
||||
"undetermined" => line.undetermined,
|
||||
_ => line.not_reportable,
|
||||
};
|
||||
assert_eq!(got, exact(want, &what(key)), "{}", what(key));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The money party shares resolve against: the cash accounts (every
|
||||
/// asset account but receivables when none are named), the cards and the
|
||||
/// financing accounts (rules.md B-35 item 5).
|
||||
@@ -1772,6 +1956,7 @@ fn check(b: &Books<'_>, x: &Expect) -> Option<&'static str> {
|
||||
&["party_part", "party_totals", "party_tin_last4"],
|
||||
);
|
||||
only(x.basis.is_some(), "basis", &["party_totals"]);
|
||||
only(x.payee.is_some(), "payee", &["vendor_1099"]);
|
||||
only(
|
||||
x.code.is_some(),
|
||||
"code",
|
||||
@@ -1817,6 +2002,7 @@ fn check(b: &Books<'_>, x: &Expect) -> Option<&'static str> {
|
||||
"trial_balance" => check_trial_balance(ex, l, x),
|
||||
"profit_and_loss" => check_profit_and_loss(ex, l, x),
|
||||
"vendor_1099_paid" => check_vendor_1099_paid(b, x),
|
||||
"vendor_1099" => check_vendor_1099(b, x),
|
||||
"entry" => check_entry(ex, l, x),
|
||||
"balances" => check_balances(ex, l, x),
|
||||
"members_equity" => check_members_equity(ex, l, &b.members, x),
|
||||
@@ -1909,19 +2095,20 @@ fn every_bookspec_example_holds() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Each query the examples use ran: the cash flow's six examples at
|
||||
// least, the as-of and 1099 examples', the members closes', the
|
||||
// formats appendix's, and P3's default period, rename, tax category
|
||||
// and parties examples'.
|
||||
// formats appendix's, and P3's default period, rename, tax category,
|
||||
// parties and 1099 examples'.
|
||||
for (q, at_least) in [
|
||||
("cash_flow", 6),
|
||||
("trial_balance", 2),
|
||||
("profit_and_loss", 2),
|
||||
("vendor_1099_paid", 3),
|
||||
("vendor_1099_paid", 4),
|
||||
("vendor_1099", 10),
|
||||
("entry", 8),
|
||||
("balances", 4),
|
||||
("members_equity", 10),
|
||||
("k1", 2),
|
||||
("party_part", 27),
|
||||
("party_totals", 21),
|
||||
("party_part", 28),
|
||||
("party_totals", 23),
|
||||
("party_tin_last4", 5),
|
||||
("iif_lines", 1),
|
||||
("iif_changes", 1),
|
||||
@@ -2297,3 +2484,36 @@ fn party_totals_without_a_basis_are_refused() {
|
||||
t.replacen("basis = \"all\"\n", "", 1)
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A `vendor_1099` line lists every figure it covers: one left out is
|
||||
/// refused.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
#[should_panic(expected = "lists exactly what it covers")]
|
||||
fn a_vendor_1099_line_leaving_a_figure_out_is_refused() {
|
||||
run_edited("1099-card-payments-are-excluded.toml", |t| {
|
||||
t.replacen(", not_reportable = \"0.00\" }", " }", 1)
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A `vendor_1099` line's status is checked: card payments that would
|
||||
/// reach the threshold leave the payee under it.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
#[should_panic(expected = "Harbor Design LLC: status")]
|
||||
fn a_vendor_1099_status_is_checked() {
|
||||
run_edited("1099-card-payments-are-excluded.toml", |t| {
|
||||
t.replacen("status = \"under_threshold\"", "status = \"reportable\"", 1)
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A payment method an event names must be in the setup.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
#[should_panic(expected = "payment method \"Harbor debit\" not in setup")]
|
||||
fn a_payment_method_not_in_the_setup_is_refused() {
|
||||
run_edited("1099-card-payments-are-excluded.toml", |t| {
|
||||
t.replacen(
|
||||
"instrument = \"Harbor debit card\"",
|
||||
"instrument = \"Harbor debit\"",
|
||||
1,
|
||||
)
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
# Seeds for failure cases proptest has generated in the past. It is
|
||||
# automatically read and these particular cases re-run before any
|
||||
# novel cases are generated.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# It is recommended to check this file in to source control so that
|
||||
# everyone who runs the test benefits from these saved cases.
|
||||
cc f1f81d6b2a71deee0cee08164bdccd96db567e863caae4f1e56263a089cb32d7 # shrinks to gens = [(0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, false)]
|
||||
cc 02aee1c532df63f34663271ebef6be02960e18365ee077c9347cd77be1e4cecb # shrinks to gens = [(0, 5, 1, 1, 0, 0, false)]
|
||||
cc b89cbcbdcf87d96e77d29b1fa57a347b7f206c338e27b7a4687b8d5b2cf29162 # shrinks to gens = [(1, 3, 1, 1, 0, 2, false)]
|
||||
+1948
-111
File diff suppressed because it is too large.
Load diff
@@ -123,6 +123,27 @@ proptest! {
|
||||
prop_assert_eq!(ri, kernel::reversal(&to_dec(&lines)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The 1099 kernel (rules.md B-19): a payment split into its buckets,
|
||||
/// and netted, the same at both types.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn payment_buckets_agree(lines in arb_lines()) {
|
||||
let bucket = |k: u8| match k {
|
||||
0 => Some(kernel::Bucket::Counts),
|
||||
1 => Some(kernel::Bucket::Card),
|
||||
2 => Some(kernel::Bucket::Undetermined),
|
||||
_ => None,
|
||||
};
|
||||
let i: Vec<_> = lines.iter().map(|&(k, s, a)| (bucket(k), s, a)).collect();
|
||||
let d: Vec<_> = lines.iter().map(|&(k, s, a)| (bucket(k), s, dec(a))).collect();
|
||||
let si = kernel::split_payment(&i).unwrap();
|
||||
let sd = kernel::split_payment(&d).unwrap();
|
||||
prop_assert_eq!(si.map(dec), sd);
|
||||
prop_assert_eq!(
|
||||
kernel::net_buckets(si).map(|b| b.map(dec)),
|
||||
kernel::net_buckets(sd)
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn balances_agree(t in arb_type(), m in arb_cents()) {
|
||||
prop_assert_eq!(kernel::normal_balance(t, m).map(dec), kernel::normal_balance(t, dec(m)));
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -56,7 +56,13 @@ fn books() -> Books {
|
||||
.add_account("1900", "Other Assets", AccountType::Asset, None, true)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let cash = l
|
||||
.add_account("1000", "Bluevine Checking", AccountType::Asset, None, false)
|
||||
.add_account(
|
||||
"1000",
|
||||
"Quillmere Checking",
|
||||
AccountType::Asset,
|
||||
None,
|
||||
false,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let card = l
|
||||
.add_account(
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1689,7 +1689,7 @@ mod shares {
|
||||
members: Vec<PartyMember>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Bluevine 1000, Due to Shareholders 2100, capital 3000 and 3001,
|
||||
/// Quillmere 1000, Due to Shareholders 2100, capital 3000 and 3001,
|
||||
/// equipment 1500, an expense 6050; members Tobin and Morgan at
|
||||
/// 50/50; a party Acme (no records).
|
||||
fn books() -> Books {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -884,6 +884,72 @@ fn defect24_a_gift_card_sold_is_received_once() {
|
||||
assert_eq!(b.totals(c, Basis::All), (Decimal::ZERO, d("100.00")));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// B-35 item 5 and `parties::card_accounts` INVARIANTS 1-4: one rule for
|
||||
/// what a card is. Before any business card is recorded, the liabilities
|
||||
/// whose names say "card" but not "gift" (2050 Business Card; never 2410
|
||||
/// Gift Card Liability), less a member's card's account; once one is
|
||||
/// recorded, exactly the business cards' liabilities, whatever their
|
||||
/// names, and a debit card on the bank (an asset) is none. A member's
|
||||
/// card or a platform is never the company's card, and a card read as a
|
||||
/// card is money: a charge to it is paid.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn a_card_is_a_recorded_business_card_else_a_liability_named_card() {
|
||||
use ledger_core::InstrumentKind as K;
|
||||
let mut b = books();
|
||||
let cards = |b: &Books| ledger_core::parties::card_accounts(&b.l);
|
||||
assert_eq!(cards(&b), vec![b.card]);
|
||||
// A member's own card, on a liability named for it: not the
|
||||
// company's, before or after a business card is recorded.
|
||||
let personal =
|
||||
b.l.add_account("2060", "Tobin's Card", AccountType::Liability, None, false)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(cards(&b), vec![b.card, personal]);
|
||||
b.l.add_instrument(K::MemberCard, "Tobin's card", None, Some(b.tobin), personal)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
cards(&b),
|
||||
vec![b.card],
|
||||
"a member's card is not a card account"
|
||||
);
|
||||
// A platform's balance is no card either.
|
||||
b.l.add_instrument(K::Platform, "Payment platform", None, None, b.prepaid)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(cards(&b), vec![b.card]);
|
||||
// A business card on the bank (a debit card, an asset): no card
|
||||
// account, so the name rule still holds.
|
||||
b.l.add_instrument(K::BusinessCard, "Debit card", None, None, b.cash)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(cards(&b), vec![b.card]);
|
||||
// A business card recorded on a liability not named "card": now
|
||||
// exactly the recorded cards' liabilities; 2050, named "card" but not
|
||||
// recorded, no longer is.
|
||||
let visa =
|
||||
b.l.add_account("2070", "Harbor Visa", AccountType::Liability, None, false)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
b.l.add_instrument(K::BusinessCard, "Harbor Visa", None, None, visa)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(cards(&b), vec![visa]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
b.l.card_accounts().into_iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
||||
vec![visa]
|
||||
);
|
||||
// Money follows the rule: a charge to the recorded card is paid; one
|
||||
// to 2050, a liability like any other now, is a promise.
|
||||
let v = b.vendor;
|
||||
let on_visa = b.post(
|
||||
date(4, 1),
|
||||
&[(b.hosting, Dr, "30.00"), (visa, Cr, "30.00")],
|
||||
&[whole(v)],
|
||||
);
|
||||
let on_2050 = b.post(
|
||||
date(4, 2),
|
||||
&[(b.hosting, Dr, "20.00"), (b.card, Cr, "20.00")],
|
||||
&[whole(v)],
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(b.resolved(on_visa).0.direction, Direction::Paid);
|
||||
assert_eq!(b.resolved(on_2050).0.direction, Direction::Neither);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// B-35 item 3, case 3: E is the movement of equity other than retained
|
||||
/// earnings, so a members' entry reads as the statement of members' equity
|
||||
/// reads it. Retained earnings given up for equipment moves no member's
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user