merge: P4b S7, bad debts (branch S7, 4b4fecb9)

The fourth of the paused branches: Ledger::write_off and the bad_debts
control role, invoice.written_off with its evidence filed in the same
store call, books.write_off_invoice, the write-off on the timeline and
in Needs attention, Lean writeOff_within_bounds, rules.md B-41 and the
bookspec examples. Twenty-eight files conflicted with the S4.4, S5 and
S6 merges; resolved as plan 8.0.2 says, keeping both sides' appends with
their seams restored, and: the scope table at 125; S7's law numbered 37;
B-41 placed before B-42; the handbook's step 4 and recovery procedures
folded into the one invoices-and-bills section; S7's wire tests in their
own module with the confirm S4.4's contract needs; S7's copy of the
payment steps dropped (S6 replaced them with Ledger::settle) and its
write-off journaled through S6's journal_auto_lines; in the old-books
fixture S7's hand-written write-off moved to a second invoice, since
S6's hand-written payment settles invoice 1 in full.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HS8WZziDnyxunC23MUxrLp
This commit is contained in:
swaitsandClaude Fable 5.1 committed 2026-10-28 21:47:33 -06:00
commit 335a3eaa7e
47 files changed
+2883 -74

No files matched your search

+200
View File
@@ -1200,6 +1200,206 @@ fn a_chain_counts_in_order() {
assert!(b.l.stands_on(rr, d(2026, 1, 25)));
}
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Write-offs (plan P4b S7; rules.md B-41)
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
/// B-38 SCENARIO 7 and B-41 INVARIANT 1: half of an invoice paid, the rest
/// written off, reads Written off with 50 paid and 50 written off, and
/// receivables falls by the write-off alone.
#[test]
fn half_paid_rest_written_off_is_written_off() {
let mut b = books();
let inv =
b.l.create_invoice(
b.customer,
d(2026, 1, 5),
d(2026, 2, 4),
line("Design", 10_000),
)
.unwrap();
b.l.receive_payment(inv, d(2026, 1, 20), cents(5_000), b.bank)
.unwrap();
let ar = b.l.chart().find_by_code("1200").unwrap().id;
let before = b.l.account_balance(ar).unwrap();
let entry =
b.l.write_off(inv, d(2026, 1, 31), cents(5_000), "collection exhausted")
.unwrap();
// One balanced entry: Dr 6990 Bad Debt Expense / Cr 1200.
let e = b.l.get_entry(entry).unwrap();
assert_eq!(e.lines().len(), 2);
let bad = b.l.chart().find_by_code("6990").unwrap().id;
assert_eq!(
(
b.l.get_entry(entry).unwrap().lines()[0].account,
b.l.get_entry(entry).unwrap().lines()[0].side,
b.l.get_entry(entry).unwrap().lines()[0].amount.amount
),
(bad, Side::Debit, cents(5_000))
);
assert_eq!(
b.l.line_doc(entry, 1).map(|t| t.movement),
Some(Movement::WriteOff)
);
assert_eq!(
b.l.account_balance(ar).unwrap(),
before.checked_sub(cents(5_000)).unwrap()
);
let st = b.l.invoice_state(inv, d(2026, 2, 1)).unwrap().unwrap();
assert_eq!(st.status, DocStatus::WrittenOff);
assert_eq!(
(st.paid, st.written_off, st.outstanding),
(cents(5_000), cents(5_000), Decimal::ZERO)
);
// The write-off counts toward no payment: the customer paid 50.
assert_eq!(
b.l.payments_recorded(DocRef::Invoice(inv)),
Ok(cents(5_000))
);
// And the control account still equals its documents.
let check = b.l.control_check(d(2026, 2, 1)).unwrap();
assert!(check.iter().all(|c| c.difference.is_zero()));
}
/// B-41 INVARIANT 3: a cash-basis company never counted the invoice as
/// income, so it has no basis to deduct (IRC §166; Treas. Reg.
/// §1.166-1(e)).
#[test]
fn write_off_refused_on_cash_basis() {
use ledger_core::settings::{Change, Source};
let mut b = books();
let src = Source {
decided_by: "Owner".into(),
decided_on: d(2026, 1, 1),
citation: None,
note: None,
};
let changes =
b.l.check_settings(
&[Change {
key: "books.accounting_basis".into(),
value: Some(serde_json::json!("cash")),
}],
&src,
)
.unwrap();
b.l.apply_settings(&changes, &src, 1).unwrap();
let inv =
b.l.create_invoice(
b.customer,
d(2026, 1, 5),
d(2026, 2, 4),
line("Design", 10_000),
)
.unwrap();
let before = ledger_core::reports::snapshot(&b.l).unwrap();
let err =
b.l.write_off(inv, d(2026, 1, 31), cents(1_000), "uncollectible")
.unwrap_err();
assert!(matches!(err, LedgerError::WriteOffOnCashBasis), "{err}");
// Nothing changed, no draft left behind.
assert_eq!(ledger_core::reports::snapshot(&b.l).unwrap(), before);
assert_eq!(
b.l.invoice_state(inv, d(2026, 2, 1))
.unwrap()
.unwrap()
.status,
DocStatus::Open
);
}
/// B-41 INVARIANT 1: at most what is owed, a partial write-off allowed
/// (Treas. Reg. §1.166-3(a)); more is refused, naming what is owed, and
/// nothing changes.
#[test]
fn write_off_above_outstanding_refused() {
let mut b = books();
let inv =
b.l.create_invoice(
b.customer,
d(2026, 1, 5),
d(2026, 2, 4),
line("Design", 10_000),
)
.unwrap();
b.l.receive_payment(inv, d(2026, 1, 20), cents(4_000), b.bank)
.unwrap();
let before = ledger_core::reports::snapshot(&b.l).unwrap();
// 60 is owed on the day; 60.01 is not.
let err =
b.l.write_off(inv, d(2026, 1, 31), cents(6_001), "uncollectible")
.unwrap_err();
assert!(
matches!(&err, LedgerError::InvalidWriteOff(why) if why.contains("60")),
"{err}"
);
assert_eq!(ledger_core::reports::snapshot(&b.l).unwrap(), before);
// Zero and a negative amount are refused too.
for amount in [Decimal::ZERO, cents(-1)] {
assert!(matches!(
b.l.write_off(inv, d(2026, 1, 31), amount, "uncollectible"),
Err(LedgerError::InvalidWriteOff(_))
));
}
assert_eq!(ledger_core::reports::snapshot(&b.l).unwrap(), before);
// What is owed on the day is taken, and the invoice reads partly paid
// and partly written off.
b.l.write_off(inv, d(2026, 1, 31), cents(6_000), "uncollectible")
.unwrap();
let st = b.l.invoice_state(inv, d(2026, 2, 1)).unwrap().unwrap();
assert_eq!(st.status, DocStatus::WrittenOff);
assert_eq!((st.paid, st.written_off), (cents(4_000), cents(6_000)));
}
/// D-49's same-year recovery, and B-41 INVARIANT 2: reversing the
/// write-off re-instates the debt (it is not a new movement), and the
/// payment then recorded settles it; a recovery is income, never a
/// payment event.
#[test]
fn write_off_then_recovery_same_year() {
let mut b = books();
let inv =
b.l.create_invoice(
b.customer,
d(2026, 1, 5),
d(2026, 2, 4),
line("Design", 10_000),
)
.unwrap();
let write_off =
b.l.write_off(inv, d(2026, 1, 31), cents(10_000), "uncollectible")
.unwrap();
assert_eq!(
b.l.invoice_state(inv, d(2026, 2, 1))
.unwrap()
.unwrap()
.status,
DocStatus::WrittenOff
);
// The recovery came in the same tax year: reverse the write-off, and
// the invoice reopens.
b.l.reverse_entry(write_off, d(2026, 3, 1), "paid after all")
.unwrap();
let st = b.l.invoice_state(inv, d(2026, 3, 2)).unwrap().unwrap();
assert_eq!(
(st.status, st.written_off, st.outstanding),
(DocStatus::Open, Decimal::ZERO, cents(10_000))
);
// Then the payment is recorded as any payment.
b.l.receive_payment(inv, d(2026, 3, 2), cents(10_000), b.bank)
.unwrap();
let st = b.l.invoice_state(inv, d(2026, 3, 3)).unwrap().unwrap();
assert_eq!(
(st.status, st.paid, st.written_off),
(DocStatus::Paid, cents(10_000), Decimal::ZERO)
);
// Receivables is back to nothing, and the write-off entry no longer
// stands (posted is forever: it is reversed, never deleted).
let ar = b.l.chart().find_by_code("1200").unwrap().id;
assert_eq!(b.l.account_balance(ar).unwrap(), Decimal::ZERO);
assert!(!b.l.in_effect(write_off));
}
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Properties
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------