feat: invoices and bills take a project, line by line (B-37 item 8)

A client project's invoiced revenue and a contractor's billed cost could
never count toward the project: books.create_invoice and books.create_bill
posted at once with untagged lines, and only a draft's line takes a class.
Job costing (B-37 item 3) collects a job's billings and the supplier
invoices for its direct costs on its cost sheet, so each document line
now takes an optional project.

The owner decided it on 2026-10-22 (plan D-43, rules.md B-37 item 8):
each line takes one project or none; a document spanning N projects is N
lines, each with its own amount; no percentage split, so every figure is
exact; a cost truly shared among projects names none on the document
and reaches projects only as entries of their own under the company's
monthly allocation convention, when books.conventions has one (otherwise
it stays untagged and the agent asks the human). The reasoning, stated
in B-37: job costing charges a job the costs traceable to it, whole, and
reaches shared costs only by allocation on a stated basis. ASC
340-40-25-7 counts as directly related both the costs traceable to a
contract (25-7(a), (b), (d), (e)) and allocations of costs that relate
directly to it (25-7(c)); 25-8 expenses general and administrative cost.
The books carry the first whole on the document's line and the second as
the allocation convention's own entries; neither is a percentage on the
document (sources/fasb-asc.md, 25-7 and 25-8 added). The handbook's
projects rule and the line's class parameter say the same, and no
handbook sentence lets a shared cost be split across a document's lines.

The accounting: the document's entry posts one revenue (an invoice's) or
expense (a bill's) line per project its lines name, in the order each is
first named, each the sum of that project's lines, and the untagged
lines' sum as one more line (arap::document_parts, conservation checked
by a proptest). A document naming no project therefore posts exactly the
one line every document posted before. The receivable or payable line is
never tagged: it is a balance-sheet line, which item 3 counts nothing;
the payments (receive_payment, pay_bill) move cash against it and take no
project either. Nothing but the projects moves: the P&L, the 1099
worksheet (payments made, B-19) and party totals (what moved the money,
B-35) read the same with or without the tags (twin-books test); the
projects with the untagged lines still partition the P&L.

- ledger-core: DocumentLine.class_id (serde-omitted when none, so old
  documents serialize as before); create_invoice / create_bill split the
  revenue or expense side by project and tag it; an unknown project is
  refused whole (atomically).
- ledger-store: a document line's project is journaled as class_id on
  invoice.created / bill.created, and the entry's line as
  entry.line_class_set right after its entry.line_added (the entry.posted
  lines carry class_id, as a hand-built entry's do). Behind a NEW journal
  feature, document_line_projects (KNOWN_FEATURES, declared by new books,
  asked for before the first journaled line, not even the control
  accounts written on refusal); not `projects`, which the live books
  already declared: the owner consents again at the next upgrade. A
  malformed class_id is corrupt; null or absent is none. Untagged
  documents journal byte for byte as before; old journals replay
  unchanged.
- ledger-mcp: each line takes class (id or name, resolved like
  add_line's, every one before anything is written); the result gains
  notes for a finished or abandoned project, and on an invoice for an
  on-spec project (is there now an agreement? on spec a hoped-for
  payment is no receivable, B-37 item 4), tagged anyway; books lacking
  the feature refuse with format_upgrade_pending. books.get_entry shows a
  line's class_id and project. The handbook's "an invoice or bill takes no
  project yet" caveat now depends on the books: gone where the feature is
  declared, an "until their format upgrade" note where it isn't.
- ledger-gui: an invoice's or bill's page (its entry's) lists the
  document's lines, each project a link that opens it; the demo's client
  invoices are tagged to "Client work", whose snapshot is now its revenue
  less its contractors. Looking at the page in a narrow window found a
  tagged line's tag pushing the amounts past the pane (any tagged entry):
  the name is now cut to leave the tag room, the tag itself at most half
  the cell.
- bookspec: an `invoice` event, and `lines` with `project` on a bill or
  an invoice; example projects-invoice-and-bill-lines-count-by-project,
  worked by hand, both projects client work (Zeta 3,500.00 - 1,200.00 =
  2,300.00; Harbor 200.00;
  untagged -1,750.00; together the P&L's 750.00; Dana's 1099 payments
  1,250.00).
- fuzz: fuzz_store_replay can declare journal features.
- Tests: core, store, MCP, viewer, the P2-served cutover fixture and a
  viewer/server parity test (its month lists the same length, not
  empty); a tagged document's reversal nets its projects to zero, live
  and replayed; books.get_entry's class_id; the handbook served as a
  resource both ways; each fix broken to confirm its test fails
  (docs/testing.md). Docs: rules.md B-27 and B-37 items 3 and 8,
  sources/fasb-asc.md, plan/served.md D-43,
  mcp-interface.md, testing.md, parity.md, plan/STATUS.md.

No proof changed (no kernel arithmetic: document_parts sums with the
existing document_total).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T3gXMVt7XJPi6ens1or9Dj

plan/served.md

@@ -1336,6 +1336,7 @@ The owner decisions of 2026-10-16 (at the top of this document) replace the form
 | D-40 | 1099s (P3, defects 23, 12 and 18; owner, 2026-10-20) | **A bank payment with no method recorded counts toward 1099s** (presumed check, ACH or transfer; debit-card payments are tagged as card). **Anthropic, PBC is recorded "not reportable: a corporation (Delaware public benefit corporation, from the public record)"**; Namecheap, Apple and OpenRouter "a corporation by name" (Treas. Reg. §1.6041-3(p)(1)), USPS "the United States" (§1.6041-3(p)(3)); Google LLC stays undecided until a W-9 shows what it is. **Needs attention asks only about vendors paid in a way that could need a 1099.** **A vendor's 1099 status is dated** (owner: "I think legally this has to be 2 dated statuses, right? If someone incorporates on Dec 30 …"): each status carries the date it takes effect (the W-9's date, or a tax election's effective date), and the worksheet applies the status in force on each payment's date. A payee that incorporates is a new legal person (a new vendor record with its own W-9); an LLC electing corporate taxation keeps its EIN and changes status on the election's date: dated statuses cover both. A status changed for a closed year warns. |
 | D-41 | The contributed devices' tax basis (P3, defect 13; owner, 2026-10-20) | **Depreciable basis is the lower of fair market value and the member's adjusted basis at conversion** (Treas. Reg. §1.168(i)-4(b); Pub. 946, property changed from personal use): for the four contributed devices, the CPA to confirm at year end. **§704(c) method: traditional**, recorded now and confirmed with the CPA before the first Form 1065 (for members filing jointly every method gives the household the same tax). **The four devices' values on 2026-10-15 are the books' amounts**, citing the entries that recorded them (figures in the company's private change log). **New P3 item: the K-1 worksheet reports tax-basis capital** (Form 1065 instructions, Item L, since 2020), the contributed property at its §723 carryover basis, beside the book figures. |
 | D-42 | A member paying for the company, on the cash flow statement (P3, defect 1; owner, 2026-10-20, revising D-35's first point after the review found ASC 230 silent on a payment a third party makes on the entity's behalf) | **Constructive receipt and disbursement:** when a member (or a lender) pays a company expense or purchase directly, the statement shows a financing inflow (borrowed from the member) and the operating or investing outflow, on that date; paying the member back is a financing outflow. Source: ASC 230 does not address it; practice fills the gap by substance (Deloitte DART Roadmap 7.2 with AICPA TQA 1300.16 and the SEC staff's view; PwC, BDO and EY guides alike), the way a CPA would present it; KPMG accepts noncash only for equipment a lender pays for. Property a member contributes that it already owned stays noncash (ASC 230-10-50-4: no cash moved). Total cash is the same either way; the first company's figures are in its private P3 change log. |
+| D-43 | Invoices and bills take a project, line by line (owner, 2026-10-22) | **Each line of an invoice or bill takes one project or none.** A document that spans N projects is N lines, each with its own amount; no percentage split, so every figure is exact. A cost truly shared among projects names none on the document and reaches projects only as allocation entries of their own under the company's monthly allocation convention, when the books have one (otherwise it stays untagged and the agent asks the human). Reasoning: job costing charges a job its traceable (direct) costs whole and reaches shared costs only by allocation on a stated basis. ASC 340-40-25-7 counts as directly related both the costs traceable to a contract (25-7(a), (b), (d), (e)) and allocations of costs that relate directly to it (25-7(c)); 25-8 expenses general and administrative costs unless chargeable to the customer. The books carry a traceable cost whole on the document's line and an allocated cost as entries under the allocation convention on its basis; neither is a percentage on the document. Behind its own journal feature, `document_line_projects`, so books that declared `projects` wait for the owner's next upgrade (rules.md B-37 item 8, B-27). |
 
 ### 10.2 Deferred