docs: D-57 and D-58, the owner's answers to Q-5 and Q-8
Q-5: one format upgrade of the live books, after S7 and P4 have landed, declaring documents_v2 and drafts_v2 together (D-52 confirmed; A-14 records it). Q-8: the review's decisions D-47 to D-54 are the owner's; the "may revisit" clauses are closed. Both asked and answered through the question tool on 2026-10-28. The owner also chose to have the planning session merge the paused branches itself. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HS8WZziDnyxunC23MUxrLp
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
af553a3706
commit
d6388d7be7
3 files changed
+13
-7
No files matched your search
+2
-2
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ You are the engineering manager (EM) of a team implementing the remaining work o
|
||||
|
||||
### Resuming the paused worktrees (2026-10-27 pause)
|
||||
|
||||
The five branches were stopped mid-gate; nothing was merged, rebased or discarded. Resume in this order, one at a time (the single-owner rule): S4.4, S5, S6, S7, P6, then S4.5. For each: rebase on `main`; resolve the known conflicts (served.md 8.0.2, "Resuming the paused wave": `crates/ledger-cli/tests/documents.rs` is an add/add on every P4b branch after the first, concatenate; `types.rs` keeps both appends; P6 retakes schema 18 and resolves eight files); renumber the laws in `docs/verification.md` at merge (S1 is 34 on `main`; S5 35, S6 36, S7 37); re-run `just check`, and `just prove` for S7 and any branch that touched `verify/lean/` or a `Ledger` command, after the rebase, since the pause killed the running gates; review against the unit's text and its As-built block (each branch carries its own); merge; move the 8.0.1 row to landed and append to `plan/STATUS.md`. P6's checkpoint is not a reviewed unit: run its gate to the end and review its `ledger-store` → `ledger-import` dependency before merging (ask the owner if you would keep it). Ask Q-5 and Q-8 when S4.4 lands.
|
||||
The five branches were stopped mid-gate; nothing was merged, rebased or discarded. Resume in this order, one at a time (the single-owner rule): S4.4, S5, S6, S7, P6, then S4.5. For each: rebase on `main`; resolve the known conflicts (served.md 8.0.2, "Resuming the paused wave": `crates/ledger-cli/tests/documents.rs` is an add/add on every P4b branch after the first, concatenate; `types.rs` keeps both appends; P6 retakes schema 18 and resolves eight files); renumber the laws in `docs/verification.md` at merge (S1 is 34 on `main`; S5 35, S6 36, S7 37); re-run `just check`, and `just prove` for S7 and any branch that touched `verify/lean/` or a `Ledger` command, after the rebase, since the pause killed the running gates; review against the unit's text and its As-built block (each branch carries its own); merge; move the 8.0.1 row to landed and append to `plan/STATUS.md`. P6's checkpoint is not a reviewed unit: run its gate to the end and review its `ledger-store` → `ledger-import` dependency before merging (ask the owner if you would keep it). Q-5 and Q-8 were answered 2026-10-28 (D-57, D-58).
|
||||
|
||||
### How to run things
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -83,4 +83,4 @@ Weekly, or when asked: the 8.0.1 table as it stands (which units landed, with co
|
||||
|
||||
- The review that produced this plan is in `plan/review-2026-10-26/`; `consolidated_review_report.md` lists every finding and what was done with it. Nothing in the code changed on 2026-10-26.
|
||||
- The sizes in 8.0.1 are rough, for an entry-level engineer new to the codebase; the recipes exist to make them hold.
|
||||
- Five owner questions are open (Q-4 to Q-8, section 10.3); Q-5 and Q-8 are due when S4.4 lands. None blocks the merges.
|
||||
- Three owner questions are open (Q-4, Q-6, Q-7, section 10.3). Q-5 and Q-8 were answered 2026-10-28 (D-57: one upgrade after S7 and P4; D-58: D-47 to D-54 stand). The owner chose to have the planning session do the merges of the paused branches itself (2026-10-28); the procedure stands for whoever does them.
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user