10 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
swaitsandClaude Opus 5.5	535874e0f3	fix(cash flow): a payment to a government is other operating, by its payee ... The P3 cutover review's open point 2: a state's LLC filing fee, booked to an organization-costs account (tax category organization_startup), read as "Cash paid to suppliers and employees". B-14 rule 5 sent a payment to class (g) only when every operating line's account was taxes_licenses, so the account, not the payee, decided. ASC 230-10-45-17, read in EY's guide that reproduces it (Statement of cash flows, July 2026, p. 43; the PDF re-fetched and its SHA-256 recorded in docs/spec/sources/fasb-asc.md), lists apart "(b) Cash payments to other suppliers and employees for other goods or services" and "(c) Cash payments to governments for taxes, duties, fines, and other fees or penalties". 45-25's classes name only income taxes (f) among the latter, so the rest are (g), other operating cash payments. A formation filing fee is rightly an organization cost (its account and tax line), and still a payment to a government: the payee is what 45-17(c) is about. So rule 5 now sends a payment's government part to (g): of an operating payment the structure classes (d), what went to a party with the government_agency or tax_agency role (the chain root's parties, so a reversal keeps its original's class) is (g), on any account; and, as before, a payment whose every operating line is on a taxes_licenses account is (g). Every party a government: the whole payment. A government and a supplier named together: the payment is split by their resolved shares (B-35), the government's part (g), the rest (d), since ASC 230-10-45-22 has "each separately identifiable source or each separately identifiable use" classed "on the basis of the nature of the underlying cash flows" (EY p. 44; quoted in fasb-asc.md; it names the three activities, read for 45-25's classes too as a CONVENTION). The government's part is the payment x its share / the whole, rounded half to even to the base currency's places, the rest exact, so the line still sums to the payment and a reversal mirrors it. Shares that don't resolve leave the whole payment (d). One naming no party is decided by its accounts. Receipts are untouched (a refund from a government stays (c)). No total changes, only which operating row a payment is in. Two limits, from the review of this change: a government selling goods or services (postage) is 45-17(b)'s supplier "for other goods or services", so the rule says, and the handbook tells the agent, to add such a payee as a vendor, never with the government_agency role (the books can't tell what a payment bought; the role says it). And payroll keeps its structure (CONVENTION): an entry with a line on the salary expense or a payroll payable control account, or on a pay tax category (salaries_wages, officer_compensation, employee_benefits, pension_profit_sharing), stays (d) whoever it names: withheld taxes remitted are the employees' pay, and the payables mix them with the employer's taxes, which a remittance can't tell apart. So a remittance to the IRS is (d) as it was before this change; the employer's payroll tax paid on its own expense account is a tax, (g). The first company's books have this case: their state filing fee moves from "Cash paid to suppliers and employees" to "Other operating cash payments" at every date once its entry names the state's agency with the government_agency role and its own entry is the one whose cash the statement lists (paid from the bank, or on a card that is a lender's credit, D-42, or by a member through the members' account while it is a financing account, B-14 rule 11, the way that fee was paid); charged to an operating-payable card, its cash leaves in the card payment, whose payee is the bank, and it stays with suppliers. STATUS says how to check both, and that the cutover goldens' cash-flow snapshots will differ on the two class lines only (totals the same), so the next cutover diff isn't read as a regression. Docs: rules.md B-14 rule 5 (the rule, its source quoted, the date and what it was before); fasb-asc.md (45-17(b) and (c) quoted exactly, with the guide's SHA-256); the handbook's entries section (name the agency as the party on a tax, fee, fine or penalty paid to a government; a shared payment named with both amounts; a government selling services added as a vendor; payroll remittances stay with pay; a fee on a card follows the card payment); fasb-asc.md also quotes 45-22 and 45-22A; bookspec example cash-flow.government-fees.toml (a filing fee and a lawyer on one organization-costs account, a license on taxes and licenses with no party, a penalty to a tax agency on the wrong account, paper from a supplier, an annual report paid through a registered agent, 37.00 the state's and 100.00 the agent's; every figure by hand) with a new `class.<a..g>` key in the cash_flow query (bookspec README; the runner checks every class the statement has is given); testing.md; STATUS. Tests: ledger-core tests/spec_cash_flow.rs `a_payment_to_a_government_is_other_operating` (the filing fee and a penalty to a tax agency (g); the same account paid to a lawyer, or with no payee, (d); its reversal next month keeps (g); a refund (c)), `a_government_payee_moves_a_fee_on_any_account` (a taxes_licenses license with no party (g); a payment shared half and half between a government and a printer split 50.00 (g) and 50.00 (d), the government alone all (g)), `a_shared_government_payment_splits_to_the_cent` (a third by percent of 100.01: 33.34 (g), 66.67 (d); amounts split as given; the reversal mirrors to the cent), `a_payroll_remittance_to_a_tax_agency_stays_pay` (withheld taxes remitted from a payable holding its payroll role, and pay on a salaries_wages account, stay (d) with the IRS named; the employer's tax on its own expense account is (g)), `a_government_selling_services_is_a_supplier` (postage to a vendor (d); given government_agency, (g): the limit the handbook guards); src cashflow.rs `tests` `a_government_part_rounds_half_to_even` and the proptest `a_government_part_sums_and_mirrors`; the bookspec example; from the P4 review, `a_reversal_takes_its_originals_payee` (a fee and its reversal next month land in one class, the chain's payee deciding: the books keep a chain's parties one, so reading the reversal's own parties is an equivalent mutant) and `a_shared_government_payment_a_member_paid_splits_both_ways` (a shared payment a member paid: each part with its own on_behalf; fails with the on-behalf part unsplit). docs/mcp-interface.md: books.cash_flow and the Roles paragraph say a government or tax agency payee makes a payment other operating, and a shared one two operating lines. Broken to confirm: without the payee check the five spec tests and the example fail; without the split for mixed payees the two shared-payment tests and the example (class.d -549.50) fail; without the payroll exclusion the payroll test fails; rounding toward zero fails both unit tests; without the tax-category route `operating_classes_follow_asc_230_10_45_25`, the second test and the example fail. The viewer's cash flow page, rendered on made-up books before and after: the fee moved from "Cash paid to suppliers and employees" to "Other operating cash payments", every total the same; and on made-up books with an annual report shared between the state and an agent: each part on its own class line, every total the same. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T3gXMVt7XJPi6ens1or9Dj	2026-10-22 19:31:18 -06:00
swaitsandClaude Opus 5.5	528c070605	feat: invoices and bills take a project, line by line (B-37 item 8) ... A client project's invoiced revenue and a contractor's billed cost could never count toward the project: books.create_invoice and books.create_bill posted at once with untagged lines, and only a draft's line takes a class. Job costing (B-37 item 3) collects a job's billings and the supplier invoices for its direct costs on its cost sheet, so each document line now takes an optional project. The owner decided it on 2026-10-22 (plan D-43, rules.md B-37 item 8): each line takes one project or none; a document spanning N projects is N lines, each with its own amount; no percentage split, so every figure is exact; a cost truly shared among projects names none on the document and reaches projects only as entries of their own under the company's monthly allocation convention, when books.conventions has one (otherwise it stays untagged and the agent asks the human). The reasoning, stated in B-37: job costing charges a job the costs traceable to it, whole, and reaches shared costs only by allocation on a stated basis. ASC 340-40-25-7 counts as directly related both the costs traceable to a contract (25-7(a), (b), (d), (e)) and allocations of costs that relate directly to it (25-7(c)); 25-8 expenses general and administrative cost. The books carry the first whole on the document's line and the second as the allocation convention's own entries; neither is a percentage on the document (sources/fasb-asc.md, 25-7 and 25-8 added). The handbook's projects rule and the line's class parameter say the same, and no handbook sentence lets a shared cost be split across a document's lines. The accounting: the document's entry posts one revenue (an invoice's) or expense (a bill's) line per project its lines name, in the order each is first named, each the sum of that project's lines, and the untagged lines' sum as one more line (arap::document_parts, conservation checked by a proptest). A document naming no project therefore posts exactly the one line every document posted before. The receivable or payable line is never tagged: it is a balance-sheet line, which item 3 counts nothing; the payments (receive_payment, pay_bill) move cash against it and take no project either. Nothing but the projects moves: the P&L, the 1099 worksheet (payments made, B-19) and party totals (what moved the money, B-35) read the same with or without the tags (twin-books test); the projects with the untagged lines still partition the P&L. - ledger-core: DocumentLine.class_id (serde-omitted when none, so old documents serialize as before); create_invoice / create_bill split the revenue or expense side by project and tag it; an unknown project is refused whole (atomically). - ledger-store: a document line's project is journaled as class_id on invoice.created / bill.created, and the entry's line as entry.line_class_set right after its entry.line_added (the entry.posted lines carry class_id, as a hand-built entry's do). Behind a NEW journal feature, document_line_projects (KNOWN_FEATURES, declared by new books, asked for before the first journaled line, not even the control accounts written on refusal); not `projects`, which the live books already declared: the owner consents again at the next upgrade. A malformed class_id is corrupt; null or absent is none. Untagged documents journal byte for byte as before; old journals replay unchanged. - ledger-mcp: each line takes class (id or name, resolved like add_line's, every one before anything is written); the result gains notes for a finished or abandoned project, and on an invoice for an on-spec project (is there now an agreement? on spec a hoped-for payment is no receivable, B-37 item 4), tagged anyway; books lacking the feature refuse with format_upgrade_pending. books.get_entry shows a line's class_id and project. The handbook's "an invoice or bill takes no project yet" caveat now depends on the books: gone where the feature is declared, an "until their format upgrade" note where it isn't. - ledger-gui: an invoice's or bill's page (its entry's) lists the document's lines, each project a link that opens it; the demo's client invoices are tagged to "Client work", whose snapshot is now its revenue less its contractors. Looking at the page in a narrow window found a tagged line's tag pushing the amounts past the pane (any tagged entry): the name is now cut to leave the tag room, the tag itself at most half the cell. - bookspec: an `invoice` event, and `lines` with `project` on a bill or an invoice; example projects-invoice-and-bill-lines-count-by-project, worked by hand, both projects client work (Zeta 3,500.00 - 1,200.00 = 2,300.00; Harbor 200.00; untagged -1,750.00; together the P&L's 750.00; Dana's 1099 payments 1,250.00). - fuzz: fuzz_store_replay can declare journal features. - Tests: core, store, MCP, viewer, the P2-served cutover fixture and a viewer/server parity test (its month lists the same length, not empty); a tagged document's reversal nets its projects to zero, live and replayed; books.get_entry's class_id; the handbook served as a resource both ways; each fix broken to confirm its test fails (docs/testing.md). Docs: rules.md B-27 and B-37 items 3 and 8, sources/fasb-asc.md, plan/served.md D-43, mcp-interface.md, testing.md, parity.md, plan/STATUS.md. No proof changed (no kernel arithmetic: document_parts sums with the existing document_total). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T3gXMVt7XJPi6ens1or9Dj	2026-10-22 19:28:40 -06:00
swaitsandClaude Opus 5.5	321b94562a	Projects: classes as entities, and the sidebar fits short windows ... A project is a class with facts (description, status, kind, party, dates, links, notes) in one project.set event behind the format feature projects. Four tools (books.add_project, update_project, projects, project); documents and decisions link to projects; B-37: on-spec costs are expensed as incurred, repayment is revenue, and the unrecovered cost is never below zero (Kani). Viewer: a Projects list and a project page with its figures, by month and by account. The sidebar measures its footer instead of reserving a fixed 172 px. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T3gXMVt7XJPi6ens1or9Dj	2026-10-22 03:50:52 -06:00
swaitsandClaude Opus 5.5	0495726001	P3 review: the surface, docs and proofs ... Split kernel::entry_flows into entry_movements and flows_of so the reversal-mirror proof fits CI; prove runs the fast harnesses, prove-slow the 8 slow ones (own job in scheduled CI), prove-all both. Laws in verification.md renumbered 1-31 with a table of all 55 harnesses. MCP docs checked against the 115 tools (about 60 fixes) with a test that every tool is documented; rules.md cross-references fixed; bookspec statuses and loader tightened; viewer notes wrap and accounts sort by code; STATUS.md says P3 is built, cutover pending. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T3gXMVt7XJPi6ens1or9Dj	2026-10-22 02:13:08 -06:00
swaitsandClaude Opus 5.5	2f999c6050	P3: assets' posted and scheduled depreciation, their bases, and the K-1 on the tax basis (defect 13, D-41) ... Book value is cost less what the books posted; the schedule's figure is apart. An asset's acquired date comes from its entry. Contributed property keeps its section 723 carryover basis apart from its depreciable basis (the lower of value and adjusted basis), with its 704(c) built-in gain and method. The K-1 worksheet reports tax-basis capital (Form 1065 Item L) beside the book figures, leaving open what only the CPA knows. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T3gXMVt7XJPi6ens1or9Dj	2026-10-21 14:04:12 -06:00
swaitsandClaude Opus 5.5	b0a9fd8ad4	P3: depreciation straight-line by days through the final month, schedules by day (defects 22, 9, D-37) ... The final month takes what the months before leave, spread over its days; a disposed asset stops on its disposal day. A skipped month is caught up in the month the run is made; a reversed run un-posts its month. New schedules spread by day; equal-months schedules must start on the 1st. Amounts round to the currency's own minor unit. Kani and Lean proofs; an exhaustive search over runs, reversals and disposals. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T3gXMVt7XJPi6ens1or9Dj	2026-10-21 14:04:11 -06:00
swaitsandClaude Opus 5.5	1304b9c0ad	P3: dated 1099 decisions, payment methods and the card exception (defects 23, 12, 18, D-40) ... A vendor's 1099 decision is its own dated fact (files NEC or MISC, not reportable with its reason, or undetermined), applied by each payment's date. Payment methods are recorded; card and network payments are left out and listed; a member's check through financing counts; a bank payment with no method counts (D-40); $2,000 for payments after 2025. One worksheet for the tool, the viewer and the CPA package. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T3gXMVt7XJPi6ens1or9Dj	2026-10-21 12:12:26 -06:00
swaitsandClaude Opus 5.5	c2ceabbae9	P3: party totals by what moved the money, once (defects 14, 11, 24) ... Each party's part of an entry is signed as its own account would show it, with a direction and its cash and in-kind amounts; a reversal is its original negated. Totals on a cash or all basis: for a member, all equals the members' equity statement and cash the K-1's cash. Money is cash, cards and the financing accounts, and a liability credit never pays its own creditor (creditor_of), so accruals and declared distributions count once. tin_last4 from the TIN or W-9 facts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T3gXMVt7XJPi6ens1or9Dj	2026-10-21 12:12:26 -06:00
swaitsandClaude Opus 5.5	9ab003d0d1	P3: rename accounts, one set of period defaults, tax categories warn or refuse (defects 15, 16, 8) ... books.rename_account; account names trimmed, bounded, refused when a sibling's or TIN-shaped; books.show refuses what its target ignores. A report asked for without dates covers this fiscal year so far, everywhere (one rule for tools, descriptions and the viewer; the IIF and CPA package keep their own dates). policy.require_tax_category warns or refuses; a Form 4797 gain is shown apart on every return. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T3gXMVt7XJPi6ens1or9Dj	2026-10-21 10:41:24 -06:00
swaitsandClaude Opus 5.5	eb4329bb2a	P3: the cash flow statement by ASC 230 (defect 1, D-35, D-42) ... Direct method with the operating reconciliation and noncash schedules; it foots by construction (Lean and Kani). Every non-cash account belongs to one section; reversals net; a member or lender paying for the company is cash borrowed and spent (D-42, constructive receipt and disbursement); property a member contributes stays noncash. The bookspec seed: one loader checks every example. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T3gXMVt7XJPi6ens1or9Dj	2026-10-21 09:35:32 -06:00