import Wanderbooks.Closing /-! # Apportioning: the parts sum to the whole, for any number of parts Mirrors `crates/ledger-core/src/kernel.rs` `apportion`: each part is first rounded down; the shortfall `s = whole - Σ parts` (not negative) is `u` whole units plus a fraction `f` (`s = u * unit + f`, `u` below the number of parts, else the function refuses). A part's *rank* is how many parts are ahead of it: a strictly larger remainder, or an equal one at an earlier index. A part of rank below `u` gets one unit; the part of rank 0 also gets the fraction. Kani proves INVARIANT 1 for up to three parts. Here it holds for every number of parts: the ranks are exactly `0, …, n-1` in some order (a strict total order ranks a finite set without gaps or ties), so exactly `u` parts get a unit and exactly one gets the fraction. -/ namespace Wanderbooks.Apportion /-- Part `j` is ahead of part `i` (the closure in `kernel::apportion`). -/ def ahead (r : Nat → Int) (j i : Nat) : Bool := decide (r j > r i) || (decide (r j = r i) && decide (j < i)) /-- A part's rank among `n` parts: the parts ahead of it. -/ def rank (r : Nat → Int) (n i : Nat) : Nat := ((List.range n).filter (fun j => ahead r j i)).length /-- What part `i` gets added: a unit if its rank is below `u`, and the fraction too if its rank is 0. -/ def add (r : Nat → Int) (n u : Nat) (unit f : Int) (i : Nat) : Int := (if rank r n i < u then unit else 0) + (if rank r n i = 0 then f else 0) theorem ahead_irrefl (r : Nat → Int) (i : Nat) : ahead r i i = false := by simp [ahead] theorem ahead_trans (r : Nat → Int) {a b c : Nat} (h1 : ahead r a b = true) (h2 : ahead r b c = true) : ahead r a c = true := by simp only [ahead, Bool.or_eq_true, Bool.and_eq_true, decide_eq_true_eq] at * omega theorem ahead_total (r : Nat → Int) {a b : Nat} (h : a ≠ b) : ahead r a b = true ∨ ahead r b a = true := by simp only [ahead, Bool.or_eq_true, Bool.and_eq_true, decide_eq_true_eq] omega theorem ahead_asymm (r : Nat → Int) {a b : Nat} (h : ahead r a b = true) : ahead r b a = false := by simp only [ahead, Bool.or_eq_true, Bool.and_eq_true, decide_eq_true_eq] at h simp only [ahead, Bool.or_eq_false_iff, Bool.and_eq_false_imp, decide_eq_true_eq, decide_eq_false_iff_not] omega /-- A filter by a weaker predicate is no longer. -/ theorem filter_length_le {p q : Nat → Bool} : ∀ (l : List Nat), (∀ x ∈ l, p x = true → q x = true) → (l.filter p).length ≤ (l.filter q).length | [], _ => by simp | a :: t, sub => by have ih := filter_length_le t (fun x hx => sub x (List.mem_cons_of_mem a hx)) have ha := sub a (List.mem_cons_self ..) cases hpa : p a <;> cases hqa : q a <;> simp_all <;> omega /-- ... and strictly shorter when some element passes only the weaker one. -/ theorem filter_length_lt {p q : Nat → Bool} : ∀ (l : List Nat), (∀ x ∈ l, p x = true → q x = true) → (∃ x ∈ l, q x = true ∧ p x = false) → (l.filter p).length < (l.filter q).length | [], _, w => by simp at w | a :: t, sub, w => by have sub' : ∀ x ∈ t, p x = true → q x = true := fun x hx => sub x (List.mem_cons_of_mem a hx) have le := filter_length_le t sub' have ha := sub a (List.mem_cons_self ..) obtain ⟨x, hx, hq, hp⟩ := w rcases List.mem_cons.mp hx with rfl | hx' · simp [hq, hp] omega · have := filter_length_lt t sub' ⟨x, hx', hq, hp⟩ cases hpa : p a <;> cases hqa : q a <;> simp_all <;> omega /-- Being ahead means a strictly smaller rank. -/ theorem rank_lt_of_ahead (r : Nat → Int) {n a b : Nat} (ha : a < n) (h : ahead r a b = true) : rank r n a < rank r n b := by unfold rank apply filter_length_lt · intro x _ hx exact ahead_trans r hx h · exact ⟨a, List.mem_range.mpr ha, h, ahead_irrefl r a⟩ /-- Distinct parts have distinct ranks. -/ theorem rank_inj (r : Nat → Int) {n a b : Nat} (ha : a < n) (hb : b < n) (h : rank r n a = rank r n b) : a = b := by apply Classical.byContradiction intro hne rcases ahead_total r hne with h1 | h1 · have := rank_lt_of_ahead r ha h1; omega · have := rank_lt_of_ahead r hb h1; omega /-- Every rank is below the number of parts (a part isn't ahead of itself). -/ theorem rank_lt (r : Nat → Int) {n i : Nat} (hi : i < n) : rank r n i < n := by unfold rank have := (List.length_filter_lt_length_iff_exists (p := fun j => ahead r j i) (l := List.range n)).mpr ⟨i, List.mem_range.mpr hi, by simp [ahead_irrefl]⟩ simpa using this /-- A duplicate-free list inside another is no longer. -/ theorem nodup_length_le : ∀ (l m : List Nat), l.Nodup → (∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ m) → l.length ≤ m.length | [], _, _, _ => by simp | a :: t, m, hn, hs => by rw [List.nodup_cons] at hn have ham : a ∈ m := hs a (by simp) have ih := nodup_length_le t (m.erase a) hn.2 (fun x hx => by have hxa : x ≠ a := fun e => hn.1 (e ▸ hx) exact (List.mem_erase_of_ne hxa).mpr (hs x (by simp [hx]))) rw [List.length_erase_of_mem ham] at ih have : 0 < m.length := List.length_pos_of_mem ham simp omega /-- Mapping a duplicate-free list by a function injective on it keeps it duplicate-free. -/ theorem nodup_map_of_inj {f : Nat → Nat} : ∀ (l : List Nat), l.Nodup → (∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b ∈ l, f a = f b → a = b) → (l.map f).Nodup | [], _, _ => by simp | a :: t, hn, hi => by rw [List.nodup_cons] at hn rw [List.map_cons, List.nodup_cons] refine ⟨?_, nodup_map_of_inj t hn.2 (fun x hx y hy => hi x (by simp [hx]) y (by simp [hy]))⟩ intro hm obtain ⟨b, hb, hfb⟩ := List.mem_map.mp hm have := hi a (by simp) b (by simp [hb]) hfb.symm exact hn.1 (this ▸ hb) /-- The ranks of `n` parts are `0, …, n-1` in some order. -/ theorem ranks_perm (r : Nat → Int) (n : Nat) : ((List.range n).map (rank r n)).Perm (List.range n) := by let L := (List.range n).map (rank r n) have nd : L.Nodup := nodup_map_of_inj _ List.nodup_range (fun a ha b hb h => rank_inj r (List.mem_range.mp ha) (List.mem_range.mp hb) h) have sub : ∀ x ∈ L, x < n := by intro x hx obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := List.mem_map.mp hx exact rank_lt r (List.mem_range.mp hi) have len : L.length = n := by simp [L] -- Pigeonhole: n distinct values below n are all of them. have all : ∀ v < n, v ∈ L := by intro v hv apply Classical.byContradiction intro hnot have := nodup_length_le L ((List.range n).erase v) nd (fun x hx => by have hxv : x ≠ v := fun e => hnot (e ▸ hx) exact (List.mem_erase_of_ne hxv).mpr (List.mem_range.mpr (sub x hx))) rw [List.length_erase_of_mem (List.mem_range.mpr hv), List.length_range] at this omega rw [List.perm_iff_count] intro a rw [List.Nodup.count nd, List.Nodup.count List.nodup_range] by_cases ha : a < n · simp [all a ha, List.mem_range.mpr ha] · have h1 : a ∉ L := fun h => ha (sub a h) simp [h1, List.mem_range, ha] /-- Sums over permuted lists agree. -/ theorem perm_sum {l₁ l₂ : List Int} (h : l₁.Perm l₂) : l₁.sum = l₂.sum := by induction h with | nil => rfl | cons x _ ih => simp [ih] | swap x y l => simp; omega | trans _ _ ih1 ih2 => exact ih1.trans ih2 /-- What the ranks `0, …, n-1` get, together: `u` units and the fraction. -/ theorem sum_by_rank (u : Nat) (unit f : Int) : ∀ n, 0 < n → u ≤ n → ((List.range n).map (fun v => (if v < u then unit else 0) + (if v = 0 then f else 0))).sum = u * unit + f | 0, h, _ => absurd h (by decide) | 1, _, hu => by rcases Nat.le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one.mp hu with rfl | rfl <;> simp | n + 2, _, hu => by rw [List.range_succ, List.map_append, List.sum_append] by_cases h : u ≤ n + 1 · rw [sum_by_rank u unit f (n + 1) (by omega) h] have : ¬ (n + 1 < u) := by omega simp [this] · have hu' : u = n + 2 := by omega subst hu' have ih := sum_by_rank (n + 1) unit f (n + 1) (by omega) (Nat.le_refl _) have eq : ((List.range (n + 1)).map (fun v => (if v < n + 2 then unit else 0) + (if v = 0 then f else 0))) = ((List.range (n + 1)).map (fun v => (if v < n + 1 then unit else 0) + (if v = 0 then f else 0))) := by apply List.map_congr_left intro v hv have := List.mem_range.mp hv simp [show v < n + 2 by omega, show v < n + 1 by omega] rw [eq, ih] have e : ((n + 2 : Nat) : Int) = ((n + 1 : Nat) : Int) + 1 := by omega simp only [List.map_cons, List.map_nil, List.sum_cons, List.sum_nil] rw [e, Int.add_mul, Int.one_mul] simp omega theorem sum_map_add (f g : Nat → Int) : ∀ (l : List Nat), (l.map (fun i => f i + g i)).sum = (l.map f).sum + (l.map g).sum | [] => by simp | a :: t => by simp [sum_map_add f g t]; omega /-- **INVARIANT 1, for any number of parts.** When the shortfall `whole - Σ parts` is `u` units plus `f` (with `u` at most the number of parts, as `apportion` requires before it changes anything), the parts after apportioning sum to `whole` exactly. -/ theorem apportion_sum (parts r : Nat → Int) (n u : Nat) (unit f whole : Int) (hn : 0 < n) (hu : u ≤ n) (hs : whole - ((List.range n).map parts).sum = u * unit + f) : ((List.range n).map (fun i => parts i + add r n u unit f i)).sum = whole := by rw [sum_map_add] let g := fun v => (if v < u then unit else 0) + (if v = 0 then f else 0) have h1 : (List.range n).map (add r n u unit f) = ((List.range n).map (rank r n)).map g := by simp [List.map_map, add, g, Function.comp_def] have h2 := perm_sum ((ranks_perm r n).map g) have h3 := sum_by_rank u unit f n hn hu show ((List.range n).map parts).sum + ((List.range n).map (add r n u unit f)).sum = whole rw [h1, h2, h3] omega /-- The same, from the shortfall as `apportion` computes it: `u` whole units by repeated subtraction (`s / unit`) and the rest (`s % unit`). -/ theorem apportion_sum_of_shortfall (parts r : Nat → Int) (n : Nat) (unit whole : Int) (hn : 0 < n) (hunit : 0 < unit) (hs : 0 ≤ whole - ((List.range n).map parts).sum) (hu : ((whole - ((List.range n).map parts).sum) / unit).toNat ≤ n) : let s := whole - ((List.range n).map parts).sum ((List.range n).map (fun i => parts i + add r n (s / unit).toNat unit (s % unit) i)).sum = whole := by intro s apply apportion_sum parts r n _ unit _ whole hn hu have hq : 0 ≤ s / unit := Int.ediv_nonneg hs (Int.le_of_lt hunit) rw [Int.toNat_of_nonneg hq] have := Int.mul_ediv_add_emod s unit rw [Int.mul_comm] at this exact this.symm /-! ## Bounded drift With exact shares there is no sub-unit fraction: every amount is a whole number of minor units (B-3) and every product `|T| × share` is exact (`periods::allocate_cumulative` INVARIANT 4), so the remainders, scaled to whole numbers below `m`, sum to whole units of `m`. Then a part that gets a unit had a positive remainder, and every apportioned part is under one unit from its exact share (rules.md B-13). -/ /-- Values in `[0, m)` that are zero wherever `p` fails sum to at most `(m - 1)` per element where `p` holds. -/ theorem sum_le_count_mul (r : Nat → Int) (p : Nat → Bool) (m : Int) : ∀ (l : List Nat), (∀ j ∈ l, 0 ≤ r j ∧ r j < m) → (∀ j ∈ l, p j = false → r j = 0) → (l.map r).sum ≤ ((l.filter p).length : Int) * (m - 1) | [], _, _ => by simp | a :: t, hr, hz => by have ih := sum_le_count_mul r p m t (fun j hj => hr j (List.mem_cons_of_mem a hj)) (fun j hj => hz j (List.mem_cons_of_mem a hj)) have ha := hr a (List.mem_cons_self ..) simp only [List.map_cons, List.sum_cons, List.filter_cons] cases hp : p a · have := hz a (List.mem_cons_self ..) hp simp only [Bool.false_eq_true, ↓reduceIte] omega · simp only [↓reduceIte, List.length_cons] have e : (((t.filter p).length + 1 : Nat) : Int) * (m - 1) = ((t.filter p).length : Int) * (m - 1) + (m - 1) := by rw [Int.natCast_add, Int.add_mul, Int.natCast_one, Int.one_mul] rw [e] omega /-- With remainders in `[0, m)` summing to exactly `u · m` (no sub-unit fraction), every part ranked below `u` (so given a unit) has a positive remainder. -/ theorem rem_pos_of_rank_lt (r : Nat → Int) (n u : Nat) (m : Int) (hr : ∀ i < n, 0 ≤ r i ∧ r i < m) (hs : ((List.range n).map r).sum = u * m) {i : Nat} (hi : i < n) (hk : rank r n i < u) : 0 < r i := by apply Classical.byContradiction intro hneg have hri : r i = 0 := by have := hr i hi; omega -- Every part not ahead of `i` has a remainder no larger than `i`'s: 0. have hz : ∀ j ∈ List.range n, ahead r j i = false → r j = 0 := by intro j hj hna have hj' := List.mem_range.mp hj have hrj := hr j hj' by_cases e : j = i · subst e exact hri · rcases ahead_total r e with h | h · rw [h] at hna exact absurd hna (by decide) · simp only [ahead, Bool.or_eq_true, Bool.and_eq_true, decide_eq_true_eq] at h omega have hle := sum_le_count_mul r (fun j => ahead r j i) m (List.range n) (fun j hj => hr j (List.mem_range.mp hj)) hz have hm : 0 < m := by have := hr i hi; omega have hrank : ((List.range n).filter (fun j => ahead r j i)).length = rank r n i := rfl rw [hrank, hs] at hle have h1 : (rank r n i : Int) * (m - 1) ≤ ((u : Int) - 1) * (m - 1) := Int.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (by omega) (by omega) have h2 : ((u : Int) - 1) * (m - 1) = (u : Int) * m - u - m + 1 := by simp only [Int.sub_mul, Int.mul_sub, Int.one_mul, Int.mul_one] omega omega /-- **Bounded drift of one apportionment** (rules.md B-13): scaled by `m`, each apportioned part (rounded down, plus its unit if any) is within one unit of its exact share `parts i + r i / m`, when there is no sub-unit fraction. -/ theorem apportion_drift (parts r : Nat → Int) (n u : Nat) (m : Int) (hr : ∀ i < n, 0 ≤ r i ∧ r i < m) (hs : ((List.range n).map r).sum = u * m) {i : Nat} (hi : i < n) : -m < (parts i + add r n u 1 0 i) * m - (parts i * m + r i) ∧ (parts i + add r n u 1 0 i) * m - (parts i * m + r i) < m := by have hri := hr i hi unfold add rw [ite_self, Int.add_zero] by_cases hk : rank r n i < u · have hpos := rem_pos_of_rank_lt r n u m hr hs hi hk simp only [hk, ↓reduceIte] rw [Int.add_mul, Int.one_mul] omega · simp only [hk, ↓reduceIte, Int.add_zero] omega /-- Σ c · f = c · Σ f. -/ theorem sum_map_mul_left (c : Int) (f : Nat → Int) : ∀ (l : List Nat), (l.map (fun j => c * f j)).sum = c * (l.map f).sum | [] => by simp | a :: t => by simp [sum_map_mul_left c f t, Int.mul_add] /-- Σ -f = -Σ f. -/ theorem sum_map_neg (f : Nat → Int) : ∀ (l : List Nat), (l.map (fun j => -f j)).sum = -(l.map f).sum | [] => by simp | a :: t => by simp [sum_map_neg f t]; omega /-- Values at most `c` sum to at most `c` per element. -/ theorem sum_le_length_mul (f : Nat → Int) (c : Int) : ∀ (l : List Nat), (∀ j ∈ l, f j ≤ c) → (l.map f).sum ≤ (l.length : Int) * c | [], _ => by simp | a :: t, h => by have ih := sum_le_length_mul f c t (fun j hj => h j (List.mem_cons_of_mem a hj)) have ha := h a (List.mem_cons_self ..) simp only [List.map_cons, List.sum_cons, List.length_cons] rw [Int.natCast_add, Int.add_mul, Int.natCast_one, Int.one_mul] omega /-- Nonnegative values have a nonnegative sum. -/ theorem sum_nonneg (f : Nat → Int) : ∀ (l : List Nat), (∀ j ∈ l, 0 ≤ f j) → 0 ≤ (l.map f).sum | [], _ => by simp | a :: t, h => by have ih := sum_nonneg f t (fun j hj => h j (List.mem_cons_of_mem a hj)) have ha := h a (List.mem_cons_self ..) simp only [List.map_cons, List.sum_cons] omega /-- Member `i`'s share of `x` rounded down to the unit: `x · w i / W` (`periods::allocate_cumulative`'s floor; shares `w i / W`). -/ def floorW (w : Nat → Int) (W x : Int) (i : Nat) : Int := x * w i / W /-- What rounding down took from it, scaled by `W`: `x · w i % W` (it ranks the members as the Decimal remainder does). -/ def remW (w : Nat → Int) (W x : Int) (i : Nat) : Int := x * w i % W /-- The whole units the floors fall short of `x`. -/ def shortW (w : Nat → Int) (W : Int) (n : Nat) (x : Int) : Nat := (x - ((List.range n).map (floorW w W x)).sum).toNat /-- The model of `periods::allocate_cumulative`'s split of a gain (`x ≥ 0`) at whole minor units: each floor, plus a unit to each of the members with the largest remainders (ties to the earlier member). -/ def allocNat (w : Nat → Int) (W : Int) (n : Nat) (x : Int) (i : Nat) : Int := floorW w W x i + add (remW w W x) n (shortW w W n x) 1 0 i /-- With the sign: a loss splits as the negation of the same gain (`allocate_cumulative` scenario 3). -/ def allocW (w : Nat → Int) (W : Int) (n : Nat) (x : Int) (i : Nat) : Int := if x < 0 then -allocNat w W n (-x) i else allocNat w W n x i /-- The floors and remainders of a gain, with shares `w i / W` summing to one: the remainders sum to whole units, `W · (x − Σ floors)`, each in `[0, W)`, and the floors fall short by fewer units than there are members. -/ theorem remW_facts (w : Nat → Int) (W : Int) (n : Nat) (x : Int) (hW : 0 < W) (hsum : ((List.range n).map w).sum = W) (hn : 0 < n) : (∀ i < n, 0 ≤ remW w W x i ∧ remW w W x i < W) ∧ ((List.range n).map (remW w W x)).sum = (shortW w W n x : Int) * W ∧ x - ((List.range n).map (floorW w W x)).sum = (shortW w W n x : Int) ∧ shortW w W n x ≤ n := by have hW0 : W ≠ 0 := by omega have bounds : ∀ i < n, 0 ≤ remW w W x i ∧ remW w W x i < W := fun i _ => ⟨Int.emod_nonneg _ hW0, Int.emod_lt_of_pos _ hW⟩ -- x · w i = W · floor + rem, summed: x · W = W · Σ floors + Σ rems. have each : ∀ i, x * w i = W * floorW w W x i + remW w W x i := fun i => (Int.mul_ediv_add_emod (x * w i) W).symm have total : x * W = W * ((List.range n).map (floorW w W x)).sum + ((List.range n).map (remW w W x)).sum := by have h1 : ((List.range n).map (fun j => x * w j)).sum = x * W := by rw [sum_map_mul_left, hsum] have h2 : ((List.range n).map (fun j => x * w j)).sum = ((List.range n).map (fun j => W * floorW w W x j + remW w W x j)).sum := by congr 1 apply List.map_congr_left intro i _ exact each i rw [← h1, h2, sum_map_add (fun j => W * floorW w W x j) (remW w W x), sum_map_mul_left] let d := x - ((List.range n).map (floorW w W x)).sum have hd : ((List.range n).map (remW w W x)).sum = W * d := by show _ = W * (x - _) rw [Int.mul_sub, Int.mul_comm W x] omega have rems_nonneg := sum_nonneg (remW w W x) (List.range n) (fun j hj => (bounds j (List.mem_range.mp hj)).1) have rems_lt := sum_le_length_mul (remW w W x) (W - 1) (List.range n) (fun j hj => by have := (bounds j (List.mem_range.mp hj)).2; omega) rw [List.length_range] at rems_lt have d_nonneg : 0 ≤ d := by apply Classical.byContradiction intro h have : W * d < 0 := Int.mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg hW (by omega) omega have d_lt : d < n := by apply Classical.byContradiction intro h have h1 : (n : Int) * W ≤ d * W := Int.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (by omega) (by omega) have h2 : (n : Int) * (W - 1) = n * W - n := by rw [Int.mul_sub, Int.mul_one] rw [Int.mul_comm W d] at hd omega have hshort : (shortW w W n x : Int) = d := Int.toNat_of_nonneg d_nonneg refine ⟨bounds, ?_, hshort.symm, ?_⟩ · rw [hshort, hd, Int.mul_comm] · have : ((shortW w W n x : Nat) : Int) < n := by rw [hshort]; exact d_lt omega /-- **The split of a gain sums to it**, exactly. -/ theorem allocNat_sum (w : Nat → Int) (W : Int) (n : Nat) (x : Int) (hW : 0 < W) (hsum : ((List.range n).map w).sum = W) (hn : 0 < n) : ((List.range n).map (allocNat w W n x)).sum = x := by obtain ⟨_, _, hx, hu⟩ := remW_facts w W n x hW hsum hn apply apportion_sum (floorW w W x) (remW w W x) n (shortW w W n x) 1 0 x hn hu rw [hx] omega /-- **`allocate_cumulative`'s split sums to the amount**, gain or loss. -/ theorem allocW_sum (w : Nat → Int) (W : Int) (n : Nat) (x : Int) (hW : 0 < W) (hsum : ((List.range n).map w).sum = W) (hn : 0 < n) : ((List.range n).map (allocW w W n x)).sum = x := by unfold allocW by_cases hx : x < 0 · simp only [hx, ↓reduceIte] rw [sum_map_neg, allocNat_sum w W n (-x) hW hsum hn] omega · simp only [hx, ↓reduceIte] exact allocNat_sum w W n x hW hsum hn /-- **Bounded drift** (rules.md B-13): each member's part of an amount is under one minor unit from their exact share, `|allocW x i · W − x · w i| < W`, gain or loss. -/ theorem allocW_drift (w : Nat → Int) (W : Int) (n : Nat) (x : Int) (hW : 0 < W) (hsum : ((List.range n).map w).sum = W) (hn : 0 < n) {i : Nat} (hi : i < n) : -W < allocW w W n x i * W - x * w i ∧ allocW w W n x i * W - x * w i < W := by have gain : ∀ y, 0 ≤ y → -W < allocNat w W n y i * W - y * w i ∧ allocNat w W n y i * W - y * w i < W := by intro y _ obtain ⟨hr, hs, _, _⟩ := remW_facts w W n y hW hsum hn have h := apportion_drift (floorW w W y) (remW w W y) n (shortW w W n y) W hr hs hi have e : floorW w W y i * W + remW w W y i = y * w i := by rw [Int.mul_comm] exact Int.mul_ediv_add_emod (y * w i) W rw [e] at h exact h unfold allocW by_cases hx : x < 0 · simp only [hx, ↓reduceIte] have h := gain (-x) (by omega) simp only [Int.neg_mul] at h ⊢ omega · simp only [hx, ↓reduceIte] exact gain x (by omega) /-- **No member's running total is ever a minor unit from their exact share**, after a cumulative close, whatever earlier closes gave them (rules.md B-13; D-10): `Closing.trueUp` with `allocate_cumulative`'s split (Kani `cumulative_close_never_drifts_a_unit_at_*` check the code on small amounts). -/ theorem allocW_cumulative_drift (w : Nat → Int) (W : Int) (n : Nat) (hW : 0 < W) (hsum : ((List.range n).map w).sum = W) (hn : 0 < n) (closed net : Int) (given : Nat → Int) {i : Nat} (hi : i < n) : -W < (given i + trueUp (allocW w W n) closed net given i) * W - (closed + net) * w i ∧ (given i + trueUp (allocW w W n) closed net given i) * W - (closed + net) * w i < W := by rw [trueUp_running] exact allocW_drift w W n (closed + net) hW hsum hn hi /-- **A cumulative close hands out exactly its net** with `allocate_cumulative`'s split, gain or loss, whatever the earlier closes gave, as long as they gave what they closed. -/ theorem allocW_cumulative_total (w : Nat → Int) (W : Int) (n : Nat) (hW : 0 < W) (hsum : ((List.range n).map w).sum = W) (hn : 0 < n) (closed net : Int) (given : Nat → Int) (hg : ((List.range n).map given).sum = closed) : ((List.range n).map (trueUp (allocW w W n) closed net given)).sum = net := trueUp_total (allocW w W n) (List.range n) (fun x => allocW_sum w W n x hW hsum hn) closed net given hg end Wanderbooks.Apportion