Accounting reason: the receipt rule (Pub. 583, Rev. Proc. 98-25: the
books must be demonstrably supported by the records) was decided in
three places that could disagree: the server's post, the digest, and a
string match on a journal-event origin in the viewer. ledger_core::
evidence::requirement is now the one decision: Required (with why) or
Exempt (with the source). A reversal needs no receipt of its own (its
evidence is its original's, D-47, D-12); neither do a closing entry, a
schedule month's or a depreciation run's posting, a disposal, a
document's entry, a payroll run or its remittance. The ledger learned
the two origins it could not see (a disposal, a remittance) from the
events that already name their entry, live and on replay. A split group
counts for a draft only: a posted entry's decision was made when it
posted.
The policy moved with it (evidence::Policy; ReceiptPolicy in
ledger-config keeps the words and delegates). Store::post_entry_checked
refuses a covered draft with no receipt (StoreError::ReceiptRequired,
which the MCP maps to the unchanged receipt_required error);
Store::post_entry stays the primitive that commands and fixtures post
through, since ~176 call sites post hand entries with no receipt. The
viewer's missing_receipt calls requirement; its string match is gone.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HS8WZziDnyxunC23MUxrLp
swaitsandClaude Fable 5.1
7299cf90f2