Stephen asked that specs come from recognized documents, not from anyone's memory. There is no single US bookkeeping bible; authority is layered, and this records it: - docs/spec/sources/: verbatim excerpts (whitespace normalized), each with URL, retrieval date, and the SHA-256 of the fetched file, of public-domain texts: Pacioli's 1494 treatise in Geijsbeek's 1914 translation (double entry, the trial balance, one money, write only forward, correct by opposite entry, close into capital); IRS Pub. 583, 538, 946, 15; the 1099-MISC/NEC instructions (2025 and 2026); 26 U.S.C. §6041, §6041A, §704; Treas. Reg. §1.263(a)-1(f) and -4(f); Notice 2015-82; Rev. Proc. 98-25; Form 1065 instructions; 17 U.S.C. §105. The excerpts were extracted by matching each passage against the fetched file, so none can contain text the source doesn't. - docs/spec/rules.md: the rule catalog, B-1 to B-22. Each rule says AUTHORITY, CONVENTION, or DECISION; cites its sources (FASB's Codification and Concepts Statement 8 and OpenStax quoted briefly, never copied: copyright and CC BY-NC-SA); and names the code that enforces it and the tests and proofs that check it. - Spec blocks in the code now carry SOURCE: lines into the catalog; AGENTS.md makes sourcing rule 0 of the formal-methods bar. Corrections the sources turned up: the de minimis limit is $500 in the regulation and $2,500 by Notice 2015-82 (both now cited); 1099 thresholds after 2026 are inflation-indexed, so the engine's flat $2,000 for 2027+ is an open question (B-19). Unverified ASC paragraphs (360-10-35-4, 340-10, 230-10-45-10, 606-10-55-37B, 210) are listed in docs/spec/README.md until someone with a FASB basic-view login reads them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GWVo7x3UHw5kwCUaWxiejX
10 KiB
AGENTS.md — wanderbooks
Operating manual for agents working in this repo. Read this first, then the docs it points to. The short version: this is an engine-first, clean-room rebuild of canonical double-entry bookkeeping, done the storytold way — agents verify against oracles, track parity automatically, and never ship what they haven't demonstrated.
What this is
wanderbooks is a from-scratch implementation of double-entry bookkeeping
semantics, built to become a full bookkeeping application (engine now, UI
later). The reference points:
- Spec: accounting principles, written down as proofs
(
docs/verification.md). That is the only authority. - Cross-check oracles: GnuCash (open source, open file formats), the
old Google Sheet, QBO/Xero exports. Useful to diff against, never
trusted to be right: a disagreement is adjudicated from principles, and
nothing may rest on another program's behavior alone. See
docs/oracle.md, "Who is right". - Workflow reference: QuickBooks Online and Xero — for what the UI must do, never for code. We observe behavior; we write our own implementation.
- Method reference: storytold/ArtCraft's app-cloning pipeline (screenshot-in-the-loop, render oracles, automated parity floors). We adapt it to accounting: semantic oracles instead of pixel oracles.
The non-negotiables
- Money is
Money. ExactDecimalplus a currency code. Binary floats (f32/f64) never appear in money paths — not for amounts, not for rates, not for "temporary" calculations. If you need a ratio, it is aDecimal. - Every entry balances. Debits equal credits exactly. No epsilon.
- Posted is forever. Posted entries are immutable. Corrections are
reversing entries linked by
reversal_of. There is no edit, no delete. - Reports are pure functions of a ledger. If a report needs state that isn't in the ledger, the ledger model is wrong — fix the model.
- Clean room. Build from public specs and observed behavior only: GnuCash documentation and file formats, the IFRS conceptual framework, IRS publications for tax-adjacent logic later. GnuCash itself is GPL — read its docs, never copy its code. This repo is MIT OR Apache-2.0. Never disassemble or copy from proprietary software.
- Accounting laws are proved, not just tested. Arithmetic that money
flows through lives in
kernel.rsand carries Kani proofs; the laws it serves carry Lean proofs.just provestays green. See "Formal methods" below.
Verification protocol (read this twice)
There is no UI yet, so "seeing what it's building" means showing the numbers. The analog of storytold's screenshot-in-the-loop:
- A green
cargo testis necessary but not sufficient. Every behavior change must be demonstrated through the public API with human-readable output: print the trial balance, the P&L, the balance sheet. Show the numbers moving the way accounting says they should. - New behavior needs new tests in
crates/ledger-core/tests/invariants.rs(or a new test file for a new crate). Tests encode accounting law, not implementation details: prefer "the accounting equation holds" over "this function returns that struct". - Golden files are sacred.
tests/golden/*.jsonhold hand-verified expected reports for canonical fixtures. If a change intentionally alters output, recompute the expected numbers by hand from accounting principles, update the golden, and explain the recomputation in the commit message. Never edit a golden to match output you haven't verified — that is how oracles die. - The randomized invariant test (
random_balanced_journals_preserve_invariants) is the always-on property oracle. Extend it when you add invariants.
Formal methods: the bar (read this three times)
Tests check the cases someone thought of; proofs check all of them. The
first formal pass on this engine (2026-10, docs/verification.md) paid
for itself several times over, on code that already had 190+ tests,
property tests, mutation testing, and 11.5M fuzz executions:
- Negative line amounts were accepted by the engine. Only the MCP layer refused them. Any other caller could post them.
- A large enough amount crashed the engine (a
Decimaloverflow panic while summing lines) instead of returning an error. - Currency conversion could crash the same way.
- The verifier itself had a soundness bug. Kani 0.68 mis-models
copy_from_sliceof symbolic length (model-checking/kani#4904): it reported a reversal that doesn't net to zero. We didn't wave it away. Replaying the counterexample natively, then shrinking it to a 15-line crate, proved it was the tool, not the books. Now a canary harness watches for the fix, and covers prove no proof is vacuous. - Writing the spec simplified the code.
credit_lineandclosing_lineturned out to be the same function. Lean also proved that no draft can exist in a closed period, the invariant that lets the store journal a post before applying it.
So the bar, for every agent, every change:
-
Specs come from authorities, not memory. Every rule the engine enforces is in
docs/spec/rules.mdwith its source: Pacioli for the mechanics of double entry, the IRS (vendored verbatim, public domain) for records, periods, 1099s, capitalization, partnerships, and payroll, FASB's Codification (cited, never copied) for GAAP. A rule no authority states is marked CONVENTION or DECISION, with who decided and when. Spec blocks in the code (```text GOAL/SOURCE/INVARIANTS/SCENARIOS) carry aSOURCE:line. Never write a spec from what the code happens to do, or from what you remember; find the document, or ask. -
Money arithmetic goes in
kernel.rs, generic overAmount. If you write a sum, a sign flip, a split, or a rounding plug anywhere else, move it into the kernel. The engine calls the kernel. It never gets a second copy. -
Every kernel function gets a Kani harness in
src/proofs.rs, on fixed arrays (no symbolic-lengthVecgrowth, nocopy_from_slice), with akani::cover!showing the interesting case is reached. -
Every new law gets a Lean theorem in
verify/lean. Laws about the books over time are theorems aboutReachablestates. A newLedgercommand is a newStepconstructor, with its preservation proof. Nosorry, ever;Audit.leanlists every headline theorem. -
Every kernel instantiation gets a bridge property in
tests/kernel_bridge.rs, so what Kani proved oni64holds onDecimal. -
A failing proof is a finding, not an obstacle. Get the counterexample, replay it natively, and decide on evidence: bug in our code, bug in the spec, or bug in the tool. Never weaken an assertion, raise a bound, or delete a harness to make red go green without writing down why in
docs/verification.md. -
More, not less. When you touch an area the proofs don't cover yet (A/R and A/P documents, payroll, depreciation, FX, persistence), leave it with more formal coverage than you found it. Proptest, mutation testing, fuzzing, Kani, and Lean all stack. Use all of them.
just check and just prove both pass before every commit that touches
ledger-core.
Parity tracking
docs/parity.md is the parity catalog: every semantic feature we intend to
clone, with status. Rules:
- Every feature change updates
docs/parity.mdin the same commit. - The floor never decreases: the count of
doneitems is monotonic. CI will enforce this once the catalog is machine-readable (roadmap phase 3); until then, it is enforced by review — yours. - Statuses are
done(implemented + tested + golden-covered),partial,todo. No other statuses.donerequires all three.
Engine-first architecture
- All mutations are commands on
Ledger(create_entry,add_line,post_entry,reverse_entry,add_account). Struct fields stay private; no other mutation path may exist. ledger-coredepends only onrust_decimal,thiserror,chrono,serde,serde_json. New dependencies need justification in the commit message. No I/O, no networking, no time-source in the core.- Future crates (
ledger-store,ledger-import,ledger-oracle,books-app) depend inward toward the core, never the reverse. Seedocs/architecture.md.
Working here
mise installsets up every tool (pinned inmise.toml): Rust, just, Kani, Lean, cargo-mutants, cargo-fuzz. If a recipe needs a tool, it goes inmise.toml; nothing gets installed by hand.- Rust stable, edition 2024.
just checkmust pass: fmt, clippy with zero warnings, every test.just provemust pass for core changes. - Conventional commits:
feat:,fix:,docs:,test:,refactor:. One logical change per commit. The commit message explains the accounting reasoning, not just the code. - You have a very large context window. Use it: when working on semantics,
load the whole
ledger-corecrate plusdocs/requirements.mdrather than guessing from snippets. - If a requirement in
docs/requirements.mdconflicts with code, the requirement wins — then fix the code, and say so.
Docs index
| Read this | When you need |
|---|---|
docs/requirements.md |
What the engine must do (R-1…), what is future work |
docs/architecture.md |
Crate layout, command pattern, dependency rules |
docs/oracle.md |
How we check correctness: golden files, property tests, fuzzing, cross-checks against other implementations (and who is right) |
docs/spec/ |
The authorities every rule comes from (rules.md), with public-domain sources vendored verbatim |
docs/verification.md |
The formal proofs: every accounting law, its Kani harness and Lean theorem, what they found |
docs/parity.md |
Feature catalog and the non-regression floor |
docs/capability-parity.md |
Parity vs the GSheet+GDrive system + the cutover rule |
docs/mcp-interface.md |
The MCP tool surface: the primary interface spec |
docs/receipt-store.md |
Blob store + ledger-store SQLite persistence spec |
docs/glossary.md |
Debit/credit and friends, for agents new to accounting |
plan/STATUS.md |
Where the project stands right now |
plan/roadmap.md |
Phase plan: semantics → oracle harness → egui app → workflow parity |
License
MIT OR Apache-2.0. New files carry no license headers; the license files at the repo root cover the tree.