readme: clarify comparison
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
07bea88fcc
commit
bf3370f0ce
1 file changed
+2
-2
@@ -160,9 +160,9 @@ You shouldn't use Dioxus if:
|
||||
## Comparison with other Rust UI frameworks
|
||||
Dioxus primarily emphasizes **developer experience** and **familiarity with React principles**.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Yew](https://github.com/yewstack/yew): prefers the elm pattern instead of React-hooks, no borrowed props, supports SSR (no hydration).
|
||||
- [Yew](https://github.com/yewstack/yew): prefers the elm pattern instead, no borrowed props, supports SSR (no hydration), no direct desktop/mobile support.
|
||||
- [Percy](https://github.com/chinedufn/percy): Supports SSR but with less emphasis on state management and event handling.
|
||||
- [Sycamore](https://github.com/sycamore-rs/sycamore): VDOM-less using fine-grained reactivity, but lacking in ergonomics.
|
||||
- [Sycamore](https://github.com/sycamore-rs/sycamore): VDOM-less using fine-grained reactivity, but no direct support for desktop/mobile.
|
||||
- [Dominator](https://github.com/Pauan/rust-dominator): Signal-based zero-cost alternative, less emphasis on community and docs.
|
||||
- [Azul](https://azul.rs): Fully native HTML/CSS renderer for desktop applications, no support for web/ssr
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user