Files
swaits fa499bdb6b docs(examples): add Ulysses16 TSP and FT06 bi-objective JSS benchmarks
Two canonical combinatorial optimization benchmarks demonstrating the
new permutation toolkit:

- tsp_ulysses16.rs — single-objective TSP via GeneticAlgorithm using
  OrderCrossover + InversionMutation. Reaches the known TSPLIB
  optimum (6859) for the 16-city Ulysses GEO-distance instance.

- jss_ft06_bi.rs — bi-objective JSS (makespan + total flow time) on
  the Fisher-Thompson 6x6 benchmark via NSGA-II using a local POX
  crossover + SwapMutation. Makespan corner reaches the known
  single-objective optimum (55).
2026-05-13 19:33:37 -06:00

213 lines
7.4 KiB
Rust
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
//! Solve a bi-objective extension of the FisherThompson FT06 job-shop
//! scheduling benchmark using NSGA-II.
//!
//! - **Benchmark**: FT06 (Fisher & Thompson, 1963), 6 jobs × 6 machines, 36
//! operations total. Each operation has a fixed machine and processing
//! time; operations within a job must run in the given order.
//! - **Canonical (single-objective) optimum**: makespan **55**.
//! - **Bi-objective extension** (this example):
//! - f₁ = makespan (Cₘₐₓ)
//! - f₂ = total flow time Σⱼ Cⱼ
//!
//! Both are standard JSS objectives in the multi-objective literature.
//! - **Algorithm**: [`Nsga2`].
//! - **Encoding**: operation-based string of length 36, each job id appears
//! 6 times. The k-th occurrence of job `j` represents the k-th operation
//! of job `j`.
//! - **Variation**: a local `PrecedenceOrderCrossover` (POX) piped into
//! [`InversionMutation`] via [`CompositeVariation`]. The strict-permutation
//! crossovers shipped in the library (OX, PMX, CX, ERX) would break the
//! operation-string multiset, so this example defines a small JSS-aware
//! crossover inline. POX is the standard crossover for operation-based JSS
//! GAs (Lee & Yamakawa, 1996; Bierwirth et al., 1996).
//! - **Initializer**: [`ShuffledMultisetPermutation`].
//!
//! Sources:
//! - Fisher, H., Thompson, G. L. (1963). *Probabilistic learning combinations
//! of local job-shop scheduling rules.*
//! - OR-Library / JSPLIB FT06 instance file.
//!
//! Run with:
//!
//! ```bash
//! cargo run --release --example jss_ft06_bi
//! ```
use heuropt::prelude::*;
use rand::Rng as _;
/// Precedence-preserving Order-based Crossover for operation-string JSS
/// encodings. Partitions job ids into two sets J1 / J2; the child takes
/// positions occupied by J1 from parent A and fills the remaining positions
/// with J2's operations in parent B's order. Two children are produced by
/// reversing the parent roles.
///
/// Preserves the JSS multiset invariant (each job id appears `N_MACHINES`
/// times) because every operation in the multiset is covered exactly once:
/// J1 ops by parent A, J2 ops by parent B.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, Default)]
struct PrecedenceOrderCrossover;
impl Variation<Vec<usize>> for PrecedenceOrderCrossover {
fn vary(&mut self, parents: &[Vec<usize>], rng: &mut Rng) -> Vec<Vec<usize>> {
assert!(parents.len() >= 2, "POX requires 2 parents");
let p1 = &parents[0];
let p2 = &parents[1];
let mut in_j1 = [false; N_JOBS];
// Ensure both partitions are non-empty to avoid degenerate (child == one parent).
loop {
for slot in &mut in_j1 {
*slot = rng.random_bool(0.5);
}
let n_in_j1 = in_j1.iter().filter(|&&b| b).count();
if n_in_j1 > 0 && n_in_j1 < N_JOBS {
break;
}
}
vec![pox_child(p1, p2, &in_j1), pox_child(p2, p1, &in_j1)]
}
}
fn pox_child(donor: &[usize], filler: &[usize], in_donor_set: &[bool]) -> Vec<usize> {
let n = donor.len();
let mut child = vec![usize::MAX; n];
for k in 0..n {
if in_donor_set[donor[k]] {
child[k] = donor[k];
}
}
let mut fill_idx = 0;
for &v in filler {
if !in_donor_set[v] {
while fill_idx < n && child[fill_idx] != usize::MAX {
fill_idx += 1;
}
child[fill_idx] = v;
fill_idx += 1;
}
}
child
}
/// FT06 routing — machine id for the k-th operation of job j.
const FT06_MACHINE: [[usize; 6]; 6] = [
[2, 0, 1, 3, 5, 4],
[1, 2, 4, 5, 0, 3],
[2, 3, 5, 0, 1, 4],
[1, 0, 2, 3, 4, 5],
[2, 1, 4, 5, 0, 3],
[1, 3, 5, 0, 4, 2],
];
/// FT06 processing times — duration of the k-th operation of job j on the
/// machine given by `FT06_MACHINE[j][k]`.
const FT06_TIME: [[f64; 6]; 6] = [
[1.0, 3.0, 6.0, 7.0, 3.0, 6.0],
[8.0, 5.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 4.0],
[5.0, 4.0, 8.0, 9.0, 1.0, 7.0],
[5.0, 5.0, 5.0, 3.0, 8.0, 9.0],
[9.0, 3.0, 5.0, 4.0, 3.0, 1.0],
[3.0, 3.0, 9.0, 10.0, 4.0, 1.0],
];
const N_JOBS: usize = 6;
const N_MACHINES: usize = 6;
const KNOWN_MAKESPAN_OPTIMUM: f64 = 55.0;
struct Ft06BiObjective;
impl Problem for Ft06BiObjective {
type Decision = Vec<usize>;
fn objectives(&self) -> ObjectiveSpace {
ObjectiveSpace::new(vec![
Objective::minimize("makespan"),
Objective::minimize("total_flow_time"),
])
}
fn evaluate(&self, schedule: &Vec<usize>) -> Evaluation {
let mut job_next = [0_usize; N_JOBS];
let mut job_clock = [0.0_f64; N_JOBS];
let mut machine_clock = [0.0_f64; N_MACHINES];
for &job in schedule {
let k = job_next[job];
let m = FT06_MACHINE[job][k];
let t = FT06_TIME[job][k];
let start = job_clock[job].max(machine_clock[m]);
let end = start + t;
job_clock[job] = end;
machine_clock[m] = end;
job_next[job] = k + 1;
}
let makespan = machine_clock.iter().cloned().fold(0.0_f64, f64::max);
let flow_time: f64 = job_clock.iter().sum();
Evaluation::new(vec![makespan, flow_time])
}
fn decision_schema(&self) -> Vec<DecisionVariable> {
(0..N_JOBS * N_MACHINES)
.map(|k| DecisionVariable::new(format!("op_slot_{k}")))
.collect()
}
}
fn main() {
let problem = Ft06BiObjective;
let mut optimizer = Nsga2::new(
Nsga2Config {
population_size: 200,
generations: 1500,
seed: 7,
},
ShuffledMultisetPermutation::new(vec![N_MACHINES; N_JOBS]),
CompositeVariation {
crossover: PrecedenceOrderCrossover,
mutation: SwapMutation,
},
);
let result = optimizer.run(&problem);
println!("FT06 — bi-objective JSS via NSGA-II");
println!("Source: Fisher & Thompson (1963); known single-objective optimum makespan = 55");
println!();
println!("Total evaluations: {}", result.evaluations);
println!("Pareto-front size: {}", result.pareto_front.len());
println!();
// Sort front by makespan ascending and print a sample of points.
let mut front: Vec<&Candidate<Vec<usize>>> = result.pareto_front.iter().collect();
front.sort_by(|a, b| {
a.evaluation.objectives[0]
.partial_cmp(&b.evaluation.objectives[0])
.unwrap_or(std::cmp::Ordering::Equal)
});
// Deduplicate by objective values so the output isn't a wall of identical rows.
let mut seen: Vec<(i64, i64)> = Vec::new();
println!(" makespan total flow time");
for c in &front {
let o = &c.evaluation.objectives;
let key = (o[0] as i64, o[1] as i64);
if !seen.contains(&key) {
seen.push(key);
println!(" {:>8.0} {:>15.0}", o[0], o[1]);
}
}
println!(" ({} unique objective-space points)", seen.len());
println!();
// Compare the makespan-corner against the known optimum.
if let Some(makespan_corner) = front.first() {
let best_makespan = makespan_corner.evaluation.objectives[0];
let gap_abs = best_makespan - KNOWN_MAKESPAN_OPTIMUM;
let gap_pct = 100.0 * gap_abs / KNOWN_MAKESPAN_OPTIMUM;
println!(
"Makespan corner: {:.0} vs. known optimum 55 (gap {:+.0}, {:+.2}%)",
best_makespan, gap_abs, gap_pct
);
}
}