Files
heuropt/SECURITY.md
T
swaits fa3f2e8fb0 feat: v0.5.0 — comprehensive documentation release
Theme: documentation and project polish. No public-API changes; this
is the v0.5 release that elevates heuropt's docs/onboarding/governance
to bar-setting status.

Adds:
- mdbook user guide at docs/book/ with intro, getting-started,
  defining-problems, choosing-an-algorithm, cookbook (7 recipes),
  comparison vs other libraries, stability/SemVer, migration guides.
  Deploys to https://swaits.github.io/heuropt/ via .github/workflows/
  docs.yml.
- Runnable rustdoc examples on every algorithm (35 of them), all
  exercised by cargo test --doc.
- Three real-world examples: portfolio.rs (multi-obj with budget
  constraint), hyperparam_tuning.rs (BO + TPE), scheduling.rs
  (permutation via SA + SwapMutation against Smith's-rule oracle).
- Governance: CONTRIBUTING.md, SECURITY.md, CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
  (adopting builderscode.org's Builder's Code of Conduct), GitHub
  issue templates, PR template.

Polishes:
- README hero with badges + user-guide link.
- lib.rs crate-level docs.
- CHANGELOG entry for 0.5.0.

Bumps Cargo.toml to 0.5.0.
2026-05-05 14:33:12 -06:00

63 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown

# Security policy
## Supported versions
Security fixes are applied to the latest released minor version on
crates.io. Patch-level releases (`0.x.y``0.x.y+1`) are issued as
needed.
| Version | Supported |
|---------|--------------------|
| 0.5.x | ✅ |
| ≤ 0.4.x | ❌ (please upgrade) |
heuropt is pre-1.0; the public API may change between minor versions.
Once 1.0.0 ships, the support window will be at least the latest two
minor versions.
## Reporting a vulnerability
Please **do not** open a public GitHub issue for a security bug.
Instead use one of these channels:
- GitHub's [private vulnerability reporting](https://github.com/swaits/heuropt/security/advisories/new)
on the repository.
- Email **steve@waits.net** with subject line `[heuropt security]
<short summary>`.
Please include:
1. A description of the vulnerability and the affected versions.
2. The smallest reproducer you can produce — a `cargo run --example
repro` is ideal.
3. Your assessment of impact and exploitability.
4. Any suggested mitigation if you have one.
## What I will do
- Acknowledge the report within **72 hours**.
- Confirm or refute reproducibility within **7 days**.
- Issue a fix in a patch release within **30 days** for confirmed
high-severity issues; less urgent issues may roll into the next
minor release.
- Credit the reporter in the CHANGELOG entry unless you ask
otherwise.
## What counts as a security issue
heuropt is a numerical library, not a network service or sandbox. The
realistic security-relevant categories are:
- **Memory safety**: any unsafe-code-related UB or unwinds-across-FFI
bug. heuropt itself uses no `unsafe`; this category covers
dependencies it transitively pulls in.
- **Denial of service**: an input to a public API that causes
unbounded memory growth, infinite loop, or panic outside its
documented panic conditions. (Documented panics for invalid config
are not bugs.)
- **Supply-chain compromise**: a published heuropt crate that doesn't
match the source on the tagged commit.
Functional correctness bugs (an algorithm produces wrong
hypervolumes, etc.) are tracked as ordinary issues, not security.